Re: [gentoo-user] Is there and Alternative to compiling kde?

["Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)" <spider@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 914 bytes --]

On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 15:55 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'll probably need the asbestos drawers here shortly:
> 
> I've burned up several hours here with a grindingly slow compile of
> kde. It is an older machine ( a few years) but is a P4 2Ghz and 500MB
> ram. Is there an alternative to this?  I mean aside from using a
> lighter, faster compiling, X setup.

> Is there some burning important reason why we need to throw away hours
> and hours compiling kde?  Wouldn't a binary distribution of kde serve
> as well in most ways?



Okay, selfplugging a bit here, but thats ok, I've got a permit.  Or
wait, no I don't, so it seems that this is still unofficial and
unsupported by others than me and then only at "best effort":

http://chinstrap.alternating.net/





-- 
begin  .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]