From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EeLBM-0008F3-7U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:34:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jALNXV5T004339; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:33:31 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jALNT1DE027713 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:29:01 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2005 23:29:01 -0000 Received: from chello080108115144.1.11.univie.teleweb.at (EHLO chello080108115144.1.11.univie.teleweb.at) [80.108.115.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 22 Nov 2005 00:29:01 +0100 X-Authenticated: #28563408 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default stage3 From: Matthias Langer To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <64e8d2f20511211401l5209d32dy151aa8749ab81563@mail.gmail.com> References: <64e8d2f20511211401l5209d32dy151aa8749ab81563@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:28:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1132615706.10257.5.camel@sputnik886.ruz-net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: e48fe51e-fd41-4859-b34c-fbb10f8b9838 X-Archives-Hash: 8babddee09122f6eb13b218880292bc9 On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 17:01 -0500, Ryan Sims wrote: > > I installed gentoo on a dual Opteron box this weekend, I've always done > > stage1 installs, but this time decided to try the recommeded stage3 method. > > I understand the concept of doing an "emerge -e world" in order to get the > > optimization of a stage1 install, and I've done this ( one time ) on the > > install I just completed. Can sombody explain why it's necessary/desirable > > to do this *twice*? > > > > What real difference does the second execution really make? > > > > As I understand it, the first time you recompile new toolchain with > your old toolchain, and then the 2nd time you're recompiling the > toolchain with the new toolchain, with the idea that the new toolchain > will compile/assemble/link/etc everything in a different way than the > old toolchain. > > Please correct if I'm wrong. I would suggest 'emerge -uD gcc && emerge -e world'; This should recompile the new toolchain with the new toolchain and be considerably faster. Matthias -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list