* [gentoo-user] oxford vs prolific vs other firewire chipsets
@ 2005-11-14 7:31 Iain Buchanan
2005-11-14 10:38 ` Benjamin Fritzsche
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Iain Buchanan @ 2005-11-14 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
(A little OT, but hey, I use gentoo :)
I am looking for a recommendation for a usb 2 and firewire 2.5 inch
external case.
I heard that there are problems with the prolific firewire chipset, a
friend had one that wiped the partition table every time he plugged it
into his PC's firewire port! (same device worked ok with usb).
I've also heard that the oxford chipset is good + fast.
I am looking for something that will be able to push as much data from
my 2.5in 60Gb 5400rpm laptop HD as possible. I'm replacing it with a
larger HD so I want to use the storage in a reasonable manner.
I appreciate your suggestions, especially if you're using a particular
device already.
Thanks,
--
Iain Buchanan <iaindb@netspace.net.au>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] oxford vs prolific vs other firewire chipsets
2005-11-14 7:31 [gentoo-user] oxford vs prolific vs other firewire chipsets Iain Buchanan
@ 2005-11-14 10:38 ` Benjamin Fritzsche
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Fritzsche @ 2005-11-14 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Monday 14 November 2005 08:31, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> (A little OT, but hey, I use gentoo :)
>
> I am looking for a recommendation for a usb 2 and firewire 2.5 inch
> external case.
>
> I heard that there are problems with the prolific firewire chipset, a
> friend had one that wiped the partition table every time he plugged it
> into his PC's firewire port! (same device worked ok with usb).
>
> I've also heard that the oxford chipset is good + fast.
>
> I am looking for something that will be able to push as much data from
> my 2.5in 60Gb 5400rpm laptop HD as possible. I'm replacing it with a
> larger HD so I want to use the storage in a reasonable manner.
>
> I appreciate your suggestions, especially if you're using a particular
> device already.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Iain Buchanan <iaindb@netspace.net.au>
My Experience: get one with an oxford chip, you'll have less trouble.
I've got a noname enclosure with a prolific chip and had my partition table
wiped a few times.
It is now running stable, but only if you load the sbp2 module with
serialize_io=1. (Wich is the default since 2.6.14)
Since I figured that out i've had no problems with the device. also make sure
to get the latest firmware if you do go for prolific. you can get it for
their homepage somewhere and flash it using a windows box and usb.
So: Prolofic devices can be made to run stable but i've heard of no problems
with oxford chips.
unless you get a prolific really cheap go for oxford.
greets Benny
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-14 10:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-14 7:31 [gentoo-user] oxford vs prolific vs other firewire chipsets Iain Buchanan
2005-11-14 10:38 ` Benjamin Fritzsche
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox