From: Iain Buchanan <iaindb@netspace.net.au>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] [smp related] 2.6.13 is 10x slower than 2.6.12!
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:27:50 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1128387470.12718.3.camel@orpheus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1127788864.11645.20.camel@orpheus>
Not long ago, I griped about 2.6.13 being _very_ slow to boot and run.
My original email is at the bottom.
I've since recompiled the kernel without SMP and Hyperthreading, and the
system is _much_ faster.
So, there is a problem with 2.6.13 and SMP or Hyperthreaded machines.
Can anyone else confirm this? What should I do? Is there a kernel.org
bugzilla? Or perhaps I should put it in the gentoo bugzilla?
Any pointers would be appreciated...
thanks.
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 12:11 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> I just compiled 2.6.13-gentoo-r2 with mostly the same options as
> 2.6.12-gentoo-r7 (my reference point). The first time I booted, it took
> about 10-15 minutes on my 3GHz P4 laptop! I watched the gdm background
> slowly display over about 30 seconds.
>
> I thought it might have something to do with the new default timer
> frequency, which I set to 250Hz instead of 1000Hz (which is the default
> for pre 2.6.13 kernels). According to various online sites, 250Hz
> should still be just as usable, and may even use less power, increasing
> my battery performance...
>
> So I changed the timer frequency back to 1000Hz, recompiled and now it
> seems a little faster, but no where near 2.6.12. It now boots in maybe
> 5 minutes, and the gdm theme takes about 5s to display.
>
> glxgears (not maximised) gives me about 30 fps with a radeon 9700!
>
> I checked the frequency governor, and the default is still
> 'performance'. /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling shows the maximum
> frequency is active as per normal.
>
> Other kernel options I changed are:
> - support for software suspend added (could this be it? I definitely saw
> the message that no valid suspend was found in my swapfile,
> and /proc/swaps shows that I have swap enabled as per usual)
> - removed unnecessary SCSI drivers (I don't have anything SCSI)
> - removed SATA support (I definitely don't have SATA)
>
> Info:
> Dell Ispiron 9100, 3 GHz HT Pentium 4
> 2.6.12 and 2.6.13: SMP support for 2 processors included
>
> I've seen 1 post online about the same thing - slow running 2.6.13, so
> surely there must be some people in the world running it ok! Any help
> on this would be appreciated.
>
> TIA,
--
Iain Buchanan <iaindb@netspace.net.au>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-04 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-27 2:41 [gentoo-user] 2.6.13 is 10x slower than 2.6.12! Iain Buchanan
2005-09-27 2:52 ` Mark Knecht
2005-09-27 4:34 ` Iain Buchanan
2005-09-27 4:48 ` Mark Knecht
2005-09-28 13:16 ` Martins
2005-09-28 23:26 ` Iain Buchanan
2005-10-04 0:57 ` Iain Buchanan [this message]
2005-10-04 8:36 ` [gentoo-user] [smp related] " Richard Brown
2005-10-06 3:51 ` Iain Buchanan
2005-10-04 12:45 ` fire-eyes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1128387470.12718.3.camel@orpheus \
--to=iaindb@netspace.net.au \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox