From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKbr1-00030o-VK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:20:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8SDAStl027981; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:10:28 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8SD08HE004235 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:00:08 GMT Received: from cpanel19.gzo.com ([69.56.132.66]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKbea-00009V-0a for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:07:20 +0000 Received: from [213.154.206.99] (helo=nirvana.office.cnk) by cpanel19.gzo.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKbea-0006Af-Kq for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:07:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Size of portage tree From: Vladimir Mikhailichenko To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <87oe6d5q8s.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87oe6d5q8s.fsf@newsguy.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Vladsoft Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:15:22 +0300 Message-Id: <1127913322.8170.11.camel@nirvana.office.cnk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel19.gzo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vladsoft.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Archives-Salt: 8e51105e-a174-46ee-b52b-df3ce714400c X-Archives-Hash: 45503fe8f32e5ee4575ad65cf7d49b35 And my /usr/portage/distfiles = 15Gb :) > I've noticed /usr/portage is standing at a little over 2 gigs in > size. Is this about normal? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list