From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EEiYk-0001El-Av for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:16:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8C7BipE009383; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:11:44 GMT Received: from mail.t-systems.cz (mail.t-systems.cz [212.67.76.249]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8C783QM014870 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:08:03 GMT Received: from mefisto.t-systems.cz (faust.t-systems.cz [10.246.110.12]) by mail.t-systems.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC88A89B73 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:12:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from andre.t-systems.cz ([10.246.112.240]) by mefisto.t-systems.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:12:09 +0200 Received: andre.t-systems.cz 10.246.112.240 from 10.246.112.176 10.246.112.176 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from frankies by andre.t-systems.cz; 12 Sep 2005 09:11:21 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Nasty bugs in portage? From: Frank Schafer To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050911230145.0616e58a@hactar.digimed.co.uk> References: <1126375769.5733.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200509102303.08309.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <1126420400.11899.23.camel@sf.rout.dyndns.org> <200509111838.37092.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <642958cc0509110958794615f7@mail.gmail.com> <20050911184526.4314eb50@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <43248287.8010508@planet.nl> <20050911230145.0616e58a@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:11:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1126509081.5947.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2005 07:12:09.0868 (UTC) FILETIME=[4A76DCC0:01C5B769] X-T-Systems_Czech-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-T-Systems_Czech-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-5.853, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, AWL 0.05, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: frank.schafer@t-systems.cz X-Archives-Salt: da222b48-ea04-4e2b-9a14-f21c4abbbcdd X-Archives-Hash: 4b80f78f16ce34b5c6a07d0716501c22 On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 23:01 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:16:23 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote: > > > No, Neil, this thread (or the original issue, at least), is occurring > > during the initial install process: > > Whoops, my mistake. This comes up so often it's easy to get the threads > muddled up :( > > > So possibly we might consider using our expertise to actually help the > > guy, in case anyone might happen to know why he's getting this breakage > > during his inital installation, rather than arguing about whether he > > should be using --emptytree or not, > > Hasn't this already been covered early in the thread? Run fix_libtool.sh > to fix the error then do emerge --resume to carry on. > > If I get it right ``fix_libtool_files.sh'' corrects the settings for libtool according to the native compiler if gcc has changed. During a native install there isn't an older version of gcc. So this should be (and was) the wrong answer. Regards and thanks for all the tries to help me Frank PS: see the [WORKAROUNDED] post -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list