From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EEi5H-00076p-Te for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:46:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8C6elNg018731; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:40:47 GMT Received: from mail.t-systems.cz (mail.t-systems.cz [212.67.76.249]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8C6aQVv024017 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:36:26 GMT Received: from mefisto.t-systems.cz (faust.t-systems.cz [10.246.110.12]) by mail.t-systems.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C7589A5C for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:40:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from andre.t-systems.cz ([10.246.112.240]) by mefisto.t-systems.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:40:39 +0200 Received: andre.t-systems.cz 10.246.112.240 from 10.246.112.176 10.246.112.176 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from frankies by andre.t-systems.cz; 12 Sep 2005 08:39:45 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [WORKAROUNDED]Nasty bugs in portage? From: Frank Schafer To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200509102303.08309.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> References: <1126375769.5733.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200509102303.08309.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:39:45 +0200 Message-Id: <1126507185.5947.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2005 06:40:39.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[E38405A0:01C5B764] X-T-Systems_Czech-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-T-Systems_Czech-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-5.851, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, AWL 0.05, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: frank.schafer@t-systems.cz X-Archives-Salt: 42fbf297-6429-4f16-9b23-e315d2ff45c5 X-Archives-Hash: b53dfee5a473d3b2078ef20336da8977 On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 23:03 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Saturday 10 September 2005 20:09, Frank Schafer wrote: > > ... or which distribution to install during less than 4 days? > > > > Hi list, > > > > as I wrote yesterday I planned to complete installation after work > > (started ``emerge --emptytree system'' in the morning). > > > > where did you get the idea that --emptytree is needed or even a wise decision? > --emptytree is almost NEVER needed and since it is a troublesom procedure, it > should not be made, until you are totally sure, that you need it. > > emerge system > > is all you need to do, to get the base system. > After that, emerge what you like to have, but NEVER use --emptytree, except > when you are able to deal with the consequences. > > Obviously you are not, so do not do it. > NO > > > was that clear enough? > Yes, that WAS clear enough. So we have an even more nasty documentation bug in the gentoo installation handbook (it tells to ``emerge --emptytree system'') and a nasty portage (or was it bootstrap?) bug (it tells me to be aware, that we need to add -e to emerge system now after finishing. > For your gcc-problem, there is the fix script, others mentioned - but a lot of > times all that is needed is to run gcc-config to set the correct gcc. gcc-config ran after the installation. (see in one fo my further posts, there was the "Native compiler changed to ..." amongst the messages. I've found (with some help of b.g.o.) that these ARE bugs. Here's the whole success story. scripts/bootstrap.sh #to work around the autoconf dependency bug emerge --oneshot --nodeps autoconf emerge --oneshot --nodeps aotoconf-wrapper #to work around the python-fchksum dependency bug emerge --oneshot --nodeps python emerge --emptytree system No fix_libtool_files.sh necessary. Why? There never was an older version of gcc. Some words to the autoconf ... will start a new thread. So much to the ability. Frank PS: You're a German? Probably this is the reason for your arrogance. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list