From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8jde-00024e-Kq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:13:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7QJ6UoF032729; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:06:30 GMT Received: from sysconcept.ca (103.205-206-12-0.interbaun.com [205.206.12.103] (may be forged)) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7QIjpRj017068 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:45:51 GMT Received: by sysconcept.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A782C2EB416; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:47:36 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0 From: Joseph To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050826182325.GA19740@princeton.edu> References: <1125072128.20768.19.camel@sysconcept.ca> <20050826173814.GB1096@princeton.edu> <1125078629.20770.38.camel@sysconcept.ca> <20050826182325.GA19740@princeton.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:47:36 -0600 Message-Id: <1125082056.20770.50.camel@sysconcept.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: baf14cef-21b4-4e7b-bec1-c2d7ee60f59c X-Archives-Hash: e8248611b583b61ad7d880222e2ddde9 On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 14:23 -0400, Willie Wong wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 11:50:29AM -0600, Joseph wrote: > > No, I set my firewall/router with my numbers. My main network is set to > > Gateway 10.0.0.1 and DHCP pool range (so other devices an get the IP > > automatically) is 10.0.0.150 - 10.0.0.180 > > Okay, so far I follow you. You have a main network. The Gateway is at > 10.0.0.1, presumably that is also where the router/dhcp server lives? > Is this the network where your PC is on? Sorry for the confusion. Yes, I have to networks one main and second backup network. So my main network (gateway) is 10.0.0.1 and this is the network I want that device to be on (it is an ATA phone adapter 4xFXS). [snip] > So hold on a second. I am lost. Are you dealing with a second separate > network? What kind of device are you speaking of? If you set the > gateway to 192.168.0.1 doesn't it conflict with the device? > > > > > When I try to set my gateway to 192.168.0.0 my DHCP pool range > > 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.0.100 doesn't work. > > > > uh... I am pretty sure octet 0 is reserved for the last word? I.e. > valid IP addresses run from *.*.*.1 to *.*.*.254? Yes, that is was causing me confusion. But I solve it. I set my backup network (in order to access the device via browser) to Gateway 192.168.0.05 (last digits anything lower than 1) and DHCP pool range to 192.168.0.2 to 192.168.0.20 > 192.168.0.0 refers actually to the network and not any particular > machines, and 192.168.0.255 is the broadcast address for the > 192.168.0.0 network.... > > Can't you move the gateway to something like 192.168.0.254 with the > DHCP range 192.168.0.2 to 192.168.0.180? Since you have a device > hardcoded to be 192.168.0.1 you should leave it out of the DHCP range. Thank you for the explanation. You understood it correctly. > > Unless, of course, I am completely misunderstanding your post. If that > is the case, post an ascii diagram or something of what the network > looks like. I've change the Lan Setting on that ATA device to DHCP and assign the static IP to 10.0.0.111 and I can access it now. -- #Joseph -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list