From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7y6A-0005JP-Ds for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:27:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7OGPN1Y009324; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:25:23 GMT Received: from core1.needhosting.net (core1.needhosting.net [65.254.55.226]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7OGKNA9007766 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:20:23 GMT Received: from adsl-69-212-55-201.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([69.212.55.201] helo=[192.168.1.2] ident=2uYljMz5ROk) by core1.needhosting.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.52) id 1E7y0C-00027a-Se for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:21:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Evolution 2.2.3 Filtering Time (Too Long!) From: fire-eyes To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1124845561.26613.129.camel@localhost> References: <1124796343.24339.3.camel@localhost> <1124845561.26613.129.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: fire-eyes.org Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:21:17 -0400 Message-Id: <1124900477.15428.2.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - core1.needhosting.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - fire-eyes.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Archives-Salt: 152af3eb-e7bc-4692-8710-f06aebf29057 X-Archives-Hash: daf53bcde1f3c173290abd242d8b7941 On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:06 +0800, W.Kenworthy wrote: > 3. use a compound filter rather than separate ones (this assumes there > is less overhead doing this - subjectively it does seem quicker) Thanks for the tips. The above one is the only one I don't really understand, can you elaborate a bit? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list