From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E4cob-0001hB-IB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:07:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7FB5Qwk017613; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:05:26 GMT Received: from core1.needhosting.net (core1.needhosting.net [65.254.55.226]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7FAwp6r008412 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:58:51 GMT Received: from adsl-69-212-59-184.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([69.212.59.184] helo=[192.168.1.2] ident=sgtphou) by core1.needhosting.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.51) id 1E4cgY-00039x-N2 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:59:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo or Linux from Scratch - Perspectives? From: fire-eyes To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050815112739.EFD0.NICK@rout.co.nz> References: <42FFBCE4.9040606@planet.nl> <42FFCA36.8000704@gmail.com> <20050815112739.EFD0.NICK@rout.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: fire-eyes.org Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:59:18 -0400 Message-Id: <1124103558.5238.1.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - core1.needhosting.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - fire-eyes.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Archives-Salt: 9bb8a686-8daa-45ea-97e1-bc48546ca898 X-Archives-Hash: 2a2904d7d7426c7815da8f636d04a142 On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:28 +1200, Nick Rout wrote: > can report WORKSFORME on unstable packages. This will provide the > data > necessary to help know when packages should be marked stable. > > > > isn't that what bugs.gentoo.org is for? I thought so at one point but got sort of flamed for it when trying it. I wouldn't recommend it. I tried to find that bug, but couldn't. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list