From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3AYe-0000dP-FM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:45:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7BAhSZY019956; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:43:28 GMT Received: from smtp813.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp813.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.12.203]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7BAdnSe000759 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:39:49 GMT Received: (qmail 73087 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2005 10:40:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO anya) (edward.catmur@btinternet.com@86.131.2.56 with plain) by smtp813.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 2005 10:40:38 -0000 Received: from capella.catmur.co.uk (capella.catmur.co.uk [::ffff:192.168.1.2]) by anya with esmtp; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:40:34 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] from 2005.0 to 2005.1 From: Edward Catmur To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0508101354f0de0a7@mail.gmail.com> References: <1cc2dc8305081006491aa8dd07@mail.gmail.com> <42FA0E1C.6050008@planet.nl> <42FA1371.7090104@internode.on.net> <20050810160002.3758c0b1@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <42FA1D4C.4030505@internode.on.net> <42FA6736.2080208@cfrscca.net> <5bdc1c8b0508101354f0de0a7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:40:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1123756830.12392.3.camel@capella.catmur.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.7 X-Archives-Salt: d4c9e8b2-814d-47e8-a900-e52af847b6dd X-Archives-Hash: 2205ad8bab73bb9f834e1c58bf4511ea On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 13:54 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: > On 8/10/05, Craig Zeigler wrote: > > If the developers bothered to write stuff like that for every package > > (most of them have changelogs BTW) Gentoo would be like Debian.. years > > between releases > > -- > > Yeah, true. Besides, when Neil made that comment he was speaking of > the iso which is the 'installation disc' so I think that Neil was > completely consistant. Running diff -upr --ignore-matching-lines='^# \ $Header:' /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.{0,1} it looks like the differences between 2005.0 and 2005.1 are: 1. The default virtuals for os-headers and linux-sources have been removed (possibly preparatory to merging headers and sources?) 2. The minimum baselayout version is 1.11.12-r4, up from 1.9.4-r3 3. The minimum binutils version is 2.15.90.0.3-r4, up from 2.14.90.0.8-r1 Of course, other architectures may have more significant changes... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list