From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E22mi-0003yX-Tn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:15:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j788Dq8v017451; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:13:52 GMT Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-09.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7889NBL027558 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:09:25 GMT Received: (qmail 9539 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2005 08:09:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO moriah.localdomain) (203.59.166.20) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 8 Aug 2005 08:09:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moriah.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A729CB020 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:09:34 +0800 (WST) Received: from moriah.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (moriah [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28709-01 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:09:30 +0800 (WST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moriah.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAA7CB004 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:09:30 +0800 (WST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] how to control portage space usage From: "W.Kenworthy" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050808090338.7f87a768@hactar.digimed.co.uk> References: <62c482fd.82fd62c4@planet.nl> <42F68570.5070408@terra.com.br> <20050808090338.7f87a768@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:09:29 +0800 Message-Id: <1123488569.7948.51.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localdomain X-Archives-Salt: d21c188e-8e5d-44b5-93e8-a6d85328f7bd X-Archives-Hash: 765fdd9e64025e3bf2c727bef67361f5 Also makes long builds like OO and xorg fail for random network issues as well seeming to take forever. My success rate for OO is under 50% of attempts when I was using NFS for the tmpdir. Did work fine for smaller builds tho. BillK On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 09:03 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 19:04:32 -0300, Francisco J. A. Ares wrote: > > > Not a script, but I have some machines with /usr/portage NFS'd to a > > server (I'm thinking about doing the same with /var/tmp/portage/ also, > > but don't know how to lock it to avoid colisions). > > Putting PORTAGE_TMPDIR on an NFS partition would slow merging down > horribly. > > -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list