From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E0NvX-0000Fr-Hk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 18:25:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j73INlAI017379; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 18:23:47 GMT Received: from deliverator6.gatech.edu (deliverator6.gatech.edu [130.207.165.168]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j73IJTkt014640 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 18:19:29 GMT Received: from hormel3.gatech.edu (hormel3.prism.gatech.edu [130.207.171.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "hormel3.prism.gatech.edu", Issuer "Tech Support CA" (verified OK)) by deliverator6.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447911FC8 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 14:20:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gtg940r@mail.gatech.edu) Received: from ([130.207.171.121]) by hormel3.gatech.edu with ESMTP with TLS id KP-BRCCR.7009153; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:31:07 -0400 Received: from deliverator1.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151DF1FAB85 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:31:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gtg940r@mail.gatech.edu) Received: from mailprx2.gatech.edu (mailprx2.prism.gatech.edu [130.207.171.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.mail.gatech.edu", Issuer "RSA Data Security? Inc." (verified OK)) by deliverator1.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0773F1FAB81 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:31:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gtg940r@mail.gatech.edu) Received: from lptp-spranger.ilcnet.local (unknown [69.15.8.89]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (sasl: method=PLAIN, username=gtg940r, sender=n/a) by mailprx2.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E04F3A612 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:31:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gtg940r@mail.gatech.edu) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] enlightenment 16 or 17 From: Luke Albers To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <1123075202.12693.1.camel@localhost> <1123082634.333.4.camel@localhost> <42F0E9C7.9020205@gmx.ch> <1123085403.333.20.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:31:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1123090265.333.22.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c892c4c1-f54c-4945-a7c3-a8d35bd971b9 X-Archives-Hash: c9b9c0a7d744047decbebec0c8bc3c14 On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 16:56 +0000, Fernando Meira wrote: > I might be wrong, but isn't that a unnecessary step?? > Even though you don't have anything else in package.keywords, once you > specify there the packages to unmask, you don't need to do it again > when you want to update E, right? Just running the 'emerge (...)' > would suffice... > > Fernando > > On 8/3/05, Luke Albers wrote: > > good call. I don't have anything else in that file so I didnt > really > pay any attention to what that script was doing. > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > yeah you only need to do the package.keywords stuff once. I just pasted that all into a script the first time I compiled E17, and kept running it every day. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list