From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dwgf0-0006Wl-Fv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:36:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6ODYSqv009701; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:34:28 GMT Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6ODRDUL032241 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:27:13 GMT Received: from omc-2.omesc.com (cpe.atm2-0-1151123.0x50a3535e.odnxx7.customer.tele.dk [80.163.83.94]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2DA5EE01D for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can't emerge mozilla-firefox-1.0.6-r2 From: Jules Colding To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <42E39586.4060805@asmallpond.org> References: <1122118718.3489.3.camel@omc-2.omesc.com> <42E291A0.5030105@gmail.com> <1122203263.16241.11.camel@omc-2.omesc.com> <42E39586.4060805@asmallpond.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:28:01 +0200 Message-Id: <1122211681.8105.4.camel@omc-2.omesc.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 06b1f93d-1017-4993-a9ce-74e1fb9ce12c X-Archives-Hash: 582459ddbd438209a9def307299ddb32 On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 15:20 +0200, Richard Fish wrote: > Jules Colding wrote: > > Hmm... Among my USE flags is "nptlonly". Might that be a problem? > > > > Well, nptlonly seems to work for a lot of people, so I don't think that > should be a problem. I've only ever heard of it affecting old > binary-only software. I am seeing random crashes of Evolution. The backtrace originates, as far I know, always in libpthread, so maybe this nptlonly is a bad idea after all? > The only change I would be tempted to make to your USE flags would be to > add multilib, which would give you the ability to build/run both 32 and > 64-bit applications. I don't see how this could fix your current > problems...but I did notice that Bob Sanders (one of the two WFM reports > on this thread) has this in his USE flags. Of course he also doesn't > have nptlonly, or userlocales, so who knows... Hmm... I am seeing "(-multilib)" when doing the emerge of gcc and binutils, so multilib is disabled by my profile and shouldn't be enabled manually, right? Thanks, jules -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list