From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939D21391DB for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7E99E097B; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0131.smtp25.com (mail0131.smtp25.com [75.126.84.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7F20E08EA for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (d-out-001.smtp25.com [67.228.158.174] (may be forged)) by d-out-001.smtp25.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s5KHUCbM015168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:30:13 -0400 Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s5KHUCO6010895 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:30:12 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] problem with nvidia card -- could it be hardware? In-reply-to: <20140620190634.67ef1065@gentoo.org> References: <31529.1403254704@ccs.covici.com> <20140620135743.4dd4f8e0@gentoo.org> <25342.1403266289@ccs.covici.com> <20140620190634.67ef1065@gentoo.org> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Wijsman message dated "Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:06:34 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:30:12 -0400 Message-ID: <10893.1403285412@ccs.covici.com> From: covici@ccs.covici.com X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110 X-SpamH-Filter: d-out-001.smtp25.com-s5KHUCbM015168 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 99b1130c-769e-4268-9aee-5227cfdc8d33 X-Archives-Hash: cde32ca9cd37e8ee5a8b77414973561d Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:11:29 -0400 > covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > > Well, I did a backtrace with what I had (I always have debug flags on) > > and it seems that the error no screens found causes an intentional > > core dump -- it was signal 6. I will check the link and see if I > > should do anything further. > > Hmm, that "no screens found" indicates a problem with the X server I > think; can you look at /var/log/Xorg.0.log and/or provide it to us? I will see if I can find it again, but it did not give any other errors, except that it said no such device, which meant hardware to me. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com