From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QSeQX-0005mR-RX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:09:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35C3E1C035; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 00:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4E01C035 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 00:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so3081453bwg.40 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:07:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=zRONBzI+G6FcOOIu0GwMVXxlFH9im/RMCcu/irPg5e4=; b=GgQ/4NnK3YHdGObeIlyfCAKbFlPVko0sWqEP5wm5X3YYc6c03dQoCBOVkrnCzzZ2UZ Dm3N9OFbEjZfbbpLRlcUt7dDjNWTf02/4TVHxpLZMZlf6i+4DUsXuQqpyf2x8Uhr47PW 8AW9/EktC79TOHYS51qks8OtjY+oTc+srHVog= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=R7jelqKCJyregdfH/j3ngdST8ojm1e8acHFffRPZdG0QWS5L6WYwmMYm/ThA7FwtjL rsKwvnQYMwxIPjpElCUsdwCMyOOmEY404UpVOhgHm9ExCT7/iyTdCrEAqiilnRderfp+ zI3Ucw9IRaPFa/52RhGxTVfNIKjbtlA6ufR0o= Received: by 10.204.151.205 with SMTP id d13mr125193bkw.117.1307146071784; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC74CC6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.76.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x6sm1603026bkv.12.2011.06.03.17.07.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:07:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: chrome and everything Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 02:07:46 +0200 Message-ID: <10164900.3lEcZ3Q9qW@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.6 rc1 (Linux/2.6.39; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20110603234939.GA23578@gaurahari.merseine.nu> References: <20110603234939.GA23578@gaurahari.merseine.nu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 32624abee055d33382e4dd482a786d70 On Friday 03 June 2011 19:49:40 Indi wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 12:50:02AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On Friday 03 June 2011 22:50:28 Mick wrote: > > > > > Agreed. I do wish we'd get something open and reasonably > > > > > well coded > > > > > to > > > > > replace flash, > > > > > > I do hope that html5 will do away with it altogether. > > > > you can easily block flash. > > > > You won't be able to block all that moving add crap in html5. Why do you > > think the ad-slingers (google the biggest among them) push for h5? > > With privoxy and noscript there isn't much that can't be blocked. you are going to be surprised.