From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qa536-0004i8-1i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:59:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 425111C05C; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85DC1C05C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:56:53 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,418,1304290800"; d="scan'208";a="523695886" Received: from 213-152-39-90.dsl.eclipse.net.uk (HELO compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org) ([213.152.39.90]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 24 Jun 2011 12:56:52 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [192.168.1.102]) by compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B713AA303 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:52:04 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1242) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? From: Stroller In-Reply-To: <20110624011411.495fb6e8@digimed.co.uk> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:56:48 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0694AAD4-23E8-4BB8-BDB1-D5BE6CB66B7C@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E01CF99.1070109@gmail.com> <20110622141242.7453a8e3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4E01EDAF.60608@gmail.com> <20110624000130.GB18036@waltdnes.org> <20110624011411.495fb6e8@digimed.co.uk> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1242) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 9da883f3bb29f8d7f8aa7a8db64f3ab6 On 24 June 2011, at 01:14, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:01:30 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: >=20 >> 1) what's the difference between "package.keywords" and >> "package.accept_keywords"? >=20 > The latter is the new name for the former. So I can just `mv /etc/portage/package.keywords = /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords` and nothing will break? Stroller.