From: Roy Wright <roy@wright.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading ~x68 kde-4.2 to kde-4.3 question
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:12:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06419014-395F-4FB2-9506-CBAD387C0D58@wright.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908162333.33798.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
On Aug 16, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Sonntag 16 August 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On Sunday 16 August 2009 23:09:41 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>> On Sonntag 16 August 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>> On Sunday 16 August 2009 21:46:02 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>>>> On Sonntag 16 August 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday 16 August 2009 21:12:30 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Sonntag 16 August 2009 21:02:50 schrieb Roy Wright:
>>>>>>>> So for the kde-4.3 upgrade, it looks like this is what will be
>>>>>>>> necessary:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1) grab the sets again from the kde-testing overlay and put
>>>>>>>> them in / etc/portage/sets (assumption is to do a replace). 2)
>>>>>>>> unmerge kde-4.2 using: emerge --unmerge @kde-4.2
>>>>>>>> 3) merge kde-4.3 using: emerge -av @kde-4.3
>>>>>>>> 4) recustomize kde as the ~/.kde will not be migrated
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am I on the right track?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) They're in portage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's asking about the set files, not the ebuilds.
>>>>>
>>>>> and you don't copy the set files.
>>>>
>>>> Which set files does one not copy, and why?
>>>
>>> you don't copy any set files because there is no reason to do so?
>>
>> And if the changes between kde-4.2 and kde-4.3 DO require changes
>> to the
>> set files to build everything, then what should one do? Not copy
>> the files
>> and live with the omission/breakage?
>>
>> Set files do not ship with a --sync, the user must either get them
>> from
>> somewhere or create them himself. And additions to 4.3 are not
>> present in
>> 4.2, so I don't understand your position. Seems to me that copying
>> working
>> set files from somewhere is a requirement in this case, especially
>> if the
>> user uses versioned set files.
>
> you install kde-testing. Suddenly you have all the set files needed.
> you have
> all the unmask files needed. You have all keyword files needed.
>
> And the overlay is not that big.
>
I've been avoiding overlays (been bit a few times) and just running a
testing (~x86) system.
The first blocker is kde-menu-icons-4.2.4 which looks like it is
replaced by kdebase-menu-icons-4.3.0, but here's what happens when
attempting to unmerge kde-menu-icons-4.2.4:
royw-gentoo portage # emerge --unmerge kde-menu-icons
Not unmerging package kde-base/kde-menu-icons-4.2.4 as it is
still referenced by the following package sets:
kdebase
>>> No packages selected for removal by unmerge
That's what started me looking for how to do the upgrade.
Went ahead and added the kde-testing overlay. Then moved /etc/portage/
kde and /etc/portage/sets to /tmp. This allowed "emerge -uDNav world"
to not have any stoppers.
So it looks like the kde-4.3 upgrade is still tightly coupled to the
kde-testing overlay.
Thank you,
Roy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-16 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-16 19:02 [gentoo-user] upgrading ~x68 kde-4.2 to kde-4.3 question Roy Wright
2009-08-16 19:12 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-08-16 19:26 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-08-26 7:25 ` Helmut Jarausch
2009-08-26 7:40 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-26 7:48 ` Dale
2009-08-26 9:23 ` Helmut Jarausch
2009-08-26 9:54 ` Dale
2009-08-26 10:08 ` Helmut Jarausch
2009-08-26 10:10 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-26 16:31 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-08-16 19:29 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-16 19:46 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-08-16 20:48 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-16 21:09 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-08-16 21:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-16 21:33 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-08-16 22:12 ` Roy Wright [this message]
2009-08-17 5:37 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-08-17 22:40 ` [gentoo-user] [solved] " Roy Wright
2009-08-17 5:44 ` [gentoo-user] " Dirk Heinrichs
2009-08-19 18:39 ` Alex Schuster
2009-08-19 21:56 ` John H. Moe
2009-08-19 22:44 ` Alex Schuster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06419014-395F-4FB2-9506-CBAD387C0D58@wright.org \
--to=roy@wright.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox