From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RqUCG-0004Gu-Gs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:37:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A57D3E0924; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E49E0924 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:36:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=TqVkdUrh c=1 sm=0 a=xvUQ5II7JMRnhGkbsebX1A==:17 a=vvcxY3LvbusA:10 a=6WvLBrxrMboA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=Uxmo08gEHq4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=DcXyYjsUFizHWd7XdR4A:9 a=t-jSuHh4d7JzH9SRMqMA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=_RhRFcbxBZMA:10 a=xvUQ5II7JMRnhGkbsebX1A==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 97.102.250.187 Received: from [97.102.250.187] ([97.102.250.187:43433] helo=basement.kutulu.org) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 30/E4-20593-41D912F4; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:36:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (basement.kutulu.org [127.0.0.1]) by basement.kutulu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BEA112002 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:36:04 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kutulu.org Received: from basement.kutulu.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (basement.kutulu.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lv9nW45EcOTX for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:36:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from MIKEDESKTOP (173.221.47.98.nw.nuvox.net [173.221.47.98]) by basement.kutulu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9510F112001 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:36:03 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike Edenfield" To: References: <4F20FDB1.1030100@gmail.com> <201201261007.53041.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20120126113314.28857d24@digimed.co.uk> <201201261257.00153.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20120126135046.196f8c4b@digimed.co.uk> <4F215DA5.4010003@hadt.biz> <4F21604F.2080309@gmail.com> <20120126160444.GA826@eisen.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120126160444.GA826@eisen.lan> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Google privacy changes Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:36:02 -0500 Message-ID: <03d401ccdc59$5bcddd40$136997c0$@kutulu.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHUNrkbcLiOGqJpSxGnpphw8eHTpwIxxBRfAdFNJVACHFTNpAEL63/rASr/bbcBBsmRsAJWZDZ8Af/Bg2IB9fwY9JWS+w5A Content-Language: en-us X-Archives-Salt: 31d70b97-f446-41fa-8fea-14d5a47e8b1a X-Archives-Hash: 11f8ec82a0d015fa422b960a4cdb92d1 > From: Frank Steinmetzger [mailto:Warp_7@gmx.de] > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:05 AM > This backs me up in using noscript and flashblock. Sometimes I doubt myself > when I get asked once more why I would use NoScript in times when most of > the web relies on JS. I then say that privacy and comfort is more important to > me than having to allow JS on a site from time to time. Of course, by using NoScript and FlashBlock when most people no longer do so, you are making yourself *more* unique and *more* trackable by Google's standards. :) --Mike