From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kuwh8-00010b-76 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:05:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE9E6E0515; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from randymail-a8.g.dreamhost.com (balanced.mail.policyd.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.119]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEEAE0515 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from quan (76-10-130-2.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.130.2]) by randymail-a8.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757E3AEA17 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:05:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "James Homuth" To: References: <200810282357.50038.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Circular blocks after last night's sync? Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:05:26 -0400 Message-ID: <03cf01c93949$4a398810$a500a8c0@quan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 In-Reply-To: <200810282357.50038.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Thread-Index: Ack5SGt0wRP2EO4bROq71xYZw7BV0AAAG7TA X-Archives-Salt: 0ee578e8-e2ba-4e03-b3d2-09d8864eee5f X-Archives-Hash: a1f1e0de1e21bb8881386c7e07dba152 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Alan McKinnon [mailto:alan.mckinnon@gmail.com]=20 Sent: October 28, 2008 5:58 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Circular blocks after last night's sync? On Tuesday 28 October 2008 22:18:05 Steven Susbauer wrote: > >Careful with the unmerges. =A0Check the following for the gory = details=20 > >and possible work arounds: > > > >http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234907 > >http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244511 > > > >Such a mess. > > Yes it is. I was extremely tempted to post a thread about this issue=20 > last night that explained the issue and the fix, as there weren't any=20 > posts about it yet but they were sure to come as people broke wget. It = > slipped my mind though. :-\ I've missed something here... How does this circumstance break wget? -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com Removing com_err will break wget depending on use flags it was compiled with. That's probably what you missed.