From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-182016-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1451138330
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 21:22:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A9ACE094B;
Sat, 13 Jan 2018 21:21:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E235EE08DA
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 21:21:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id f140so17848543wmd.2
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:21:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=UFqB2LzAHhKO+PsDldse/Iorq5aTVZJX6T7EXN/RhI0=;
b=JKWQ2Uqty3Vse6a0MxGYTrNNIpbvg8V4KGzvD7UnIh4KVXgXQb5BmFE/U0U2WrUrd9
GhD2uMQ/3Y/I3KcKNhUZhg/KzCi+Hv2xp023yb7bxqG5xYxVeGfjiRXHyFNYtj4FI3nB
x5mPm4MeckmyVFngh+1Cb9XdEJHUswPTXNxYk2eBpKReKdBYJAeeGbscKNEBnWXSKzqV
qEZ08jM4Xxbtnlcy92xR3KiO1pvaT+11JzCExhiwm1+MPFPdtCACNZdNBMF7hiBQFUpx
oMkelCqm/X5y3tr4HXVNlk2SSnT8ZyhstBOH3VZV+AdGWYM49Ldrq8rcAepphWuiuwJ6
MMIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=UFqB2LzAHhKO+PsDldse/Iorq5aTVZJX6T7EXN/RhI0=;
b=hPM2xYcQ08hfxJZAPKLD2tIk0uLzZoNA/0I0Hi+rnJ50aiakAKP11GtKBmEIFigTW3
oac/DWSaDxkRAr57dHDYbJeHFPIiywtKSXFRoqutUahefGydPLdhkDlF/kJ1BY/C2iEB
G4NbzLbWk2OcaV/ISWt5JGobuOnjC+eik07GAlJQgn9GvWqvYl/Tct72cGEvzxTAz7Oq
4DRrm6EQts7kOZc1VRgjix37VWbYFjVTtxtpX/z7/rKOIa6hhWfwWIurYy5buWX9idx2
dAfPy9zF5wjgqkka2pLAQCSsw8e4Q4YLedc2aJNvDZhKO6P4FkjNgbh2b4hdfX6v1QtP
pwCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyteLbSKkABsokLuR8u5FqnfulpXYo3iy+lCQC+yLYRVmZ7iRyHb4
Us0hE82XxB6NqFLEDZXYQg0o8g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouZLq9sYWuj77JSx4VEQ1UeFDrlzWelNVLExXrLwjbjupiG/G9ETTZakJFKd4k3R92FI6YaZw==
X-Received: by 10.28.91.142 with SMTP id p136mr6734920wmb.55.1515878516366;
Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.0.40] ([197.101.48.133])
by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e197sm19085174wmf.4.2018.01.13.13.21.55
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] fsck check of /usr on a separate partition fails
during boot
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1515841123.569865.1234053704.79666D14@webmail.messagingengine.com>
<20180113172932.GA22136@31c0.net>
<1515871850.730519.1234341488.39240761@webmail.messagingengine.com>
<f93f4690-2480-b2e0-0fb6-41cbb6d416e7@gmail.com>
<20180113205411.3bab9ace@digimed.co.uk>
<CAMtWw9x+_zkKeQBcj+XFtF6BriJOTAMNH_1PkmYSJedKa9jpRg@mail.gmail.com>
<20180113211602.5a4b22d5@digimed.co.uk>
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0290d20a-6423-1c5a-dd5b-68569216c2b5@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 23:16:19 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180113211602.5a4b22d5@digimed.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 3fdd9ada-b666-48aa-8cc0-b17eeb0a5b47
X-Archives-Hash: fbf2281082de3d06142d6d1f49b61687
On 13/01/2018 23:16, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 14:57:59 -0600, John Johnson wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't that be taken care of by the "/etc/fstab" entries?
>
> Those say whether the filesystem should be checked, not when.
>
>> Obviously, if "/usr" is on a separate partition, it needs to be mounted
>> at the time when "/usr/sbin/fsck" is expected to be present.
>
> fsck is in /sbin, but that's not the point. If you have an initramfs,
> fsck should be in it and run before /usr is mounted rw, which means it
> has to be done by the initramfs. It's too late to do it when control has
> been handed over because then /usr is already mounted rw.
So what does the dirty check and fsck of / ?
I don't have an initramfs, I don't have a separate /usr, I run OpenRC
and the kernel command line says where / is for mounting
--
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com