From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JfpIS-0001bo-9a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:37:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2717AE0529; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mars.karoo.kcom.com (mars.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.54]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01D2E0529 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:37:28 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,576,1199664000"; d="scan'208";a="297580715" Received: from compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org ([213.152.39.90]) by mars.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2008 05:37:27 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (funf.stroller.uk.eu.org [192.168.1.71]) by compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE572F26F8 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:37:26 +0100 (BST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: <200803252159.41035.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <200803252349.07913.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <1518891.xE1fNS9abT@schmarck.cn> <47ED6AA5.9070203@gmail.com> <3B6C7B0C-85D3-431C-B66B-6127E85B8DDE@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <027E8EFC-8102-44A2-AFCC-9D9C32BA21E0@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stroller Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: rhythmbox plays silently Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:37:23 +0100 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Archives-Salt: 441eedf3-679f-4b99-9425-03312011ea62 X-Archives-Hash: 8ab01aa1d1f40f48c008e81a755c39f5 On 29 Mar 2008, at 20:39, Michael Schmarck wrote: > Stroller stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes: > >> I, too, thought about saying something like this at the time. I'm >> glad you have done so and I agree with all your points. > > I don't. I disagree with his most important point... Yes, but you're demonstrating yourself to be a clueless idiot. >> Alan's reply was harmless. You're not entitled to pick on him unless >> you posted correctly in the first place. > > So, I *am* entitled. Thanks! No, you're not. >> You're asking for help - provide as much information as possible and >> please don't antagonise people (especially because they may be able >> to help you!). > > Now, please go back and read Alans first post in the thread. It > absolutely did not sound, as if he even wanted to help. That doesn't matter. Please don't antagonise people, full-stop. >> I, too, know what it's like to receive a reply to one of my questions >> which I find to be unhelpful and aggravating. However, "two wrongs >> don't make a right" and no-one benefits from an angry response. > > Oh, so it's now my fault for responding to a flamebait? Nice. It's > not the aggressor who's doing something wrong? It was NOT flamebait. It was HARMLESS. Grown up! Stroller. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list