From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Genlop wonky again
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 08:56:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0203f68a-f02f-447d-af93-3ce828c41acf@youngman.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC_tCmquWN0WzubD2Dtui0SPOayyFoUj0LUKjS4dC-K1AZ78iw@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/01/2024 00:54, John Blinka wrote:
> I’ve often found that it gives one estimate when multiple packages are
> being built, then a much longer estimate for still-in-progress builds
> once some of the builds have finished.
>
> That result defies common sense. Less remaining work has to take less,
> not more (much more), time.
Common sense isn't common and, well, often doesn't make sense.
If there's a bunch of small builds skewing the "time per build" estimate
down, as they drop off the list the estimated time per build will go up,
and if the skew is serious enough it can even make the total estimated
time go up ...
Cheers,
Wol
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-06 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-05 23:51 [gentoo-user] Genlop wonky again Peter Humphrey
2024-01-06 0:54 ` John Blinka
2024-01-06 8:56 ` Wols Lists [this message]
2024-01-06 16:12 ` John Blinka
2024-01-06 16:21 ` Wols Lists
2024-01-06 16:29 ` Jack
2024-01-06 17:46 ` gennaro amelio
2024-01-06 17:59 ` Peter Humphrey
2024-01-06 19:28 ` Wols Lists
2024-01-07 0:52 ` Peter Humphrey
2024-01-07 8:34 ` Wols Lists
2024-01-09 3:35 ` Peter Humphrey
2024-01-09 5:26 ` Wols Lists
2024-01-07 10:12 ` Wols Lists
2024-01-06 16:26 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2024-01-06 18:02 ` Peter Humphrey
2024-01-07 9:54 ` [gentoo-user] " Nuno Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0203f68a-f02f-447d-af93-3ce828c41acf@youngman.org.uk \
--to=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox