public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dave Nebinger" <dnebinger@joat.com>
To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Nasty bugs in portage?
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:27:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00d501c5b706$d1f41bd0$0a00a8c0@butthead> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200509111415.46410.john@jolet.net

>> Starting from stage 1 & 2 allows you to build a box customized from the
>> ground up optimized for your hardware (assuming you've set the cflags
>> correctly before beginning).
>>
>> IMHO, stage 3 is for those that don't want to take the lengthy build time
>> for some of the larger packages, i.e. X and kde/gnome, in order to have a
>> basic working gentoo system in a short timeframe.
> I'm not sure where you get this from, since X and kde/gnome  aren't IN a
> stage-3 tarball.

Oops, my bad.  Shows how many stage-3 installs I've done ;-)

> As I stated before, iterative testing with several binary
> distros and a stage-3 gentoo on this here laptop have shown that, even
> starting with stage-3, gentoo is faster and more efficient.

I wasn't questioning whether gentoo would be faster and/or more efficient 
than the other binary distros.

My point was that, for the most part, saying "start with stage 3" is like 
saying "use a binary distrib".  With stage 3 you're starting with 
precompiled binaries that are built targeting someone else's hardware, not 
your own. 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-11 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-10 18:09 [gentoo-user] Nasty bugs in portage? Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 18:37 ` Dave Nebinger
1987-12-31 23:18   ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 19:26     ` John Jolet
2005-09-10 19:33       ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 21:08         ` Zac Medico
2005-09-10 19:39     ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-10 19:49       ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 20:09     ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-10 20:13   ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-10 19:42 ` Justin Patrin
2005-09-10 19:47   ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 21:03 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-11  6:33   ` Nick Rout
2005-09-11  9:04     ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 16:38     ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-11 16:58       ` Mark Shields
2005-09-11 17:12         ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-11 17:49           ` Zac Medico
2005-09-11 18:12             ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-11 18:18               ` Zac Medico
2005-09-11 18:30                 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-11 19:51                   ` Zac Medico
2005-09-11 21:56                   ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 19:15               ` John Jolet
2005-09-11 19:27                 ` Dave Nebinger [this message]
2005-09-11 21:57                 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 22:24                   ` John Jolet
2005-09-11 23:15                     ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 23:49                       ` Nick Rout
2005-09-12  7:27                         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-13 20:42                           ` Andrew MacKenzie
2005-09-12  0:59                       ` John Jolet
2005-09-12  7:31                         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 23:39           ` Nick Rout
2005-09-12  7:00           ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12 16:32             ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-11 17:45         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 19:16           ` Holly Bostick
2005-09-11 22:01             ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-12  7:11               ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12  7:33                 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-12  7:52                   ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12 22:31                 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-13 10:53                   ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-11 23:51           ` Nick Rout
2005-09-12  6:56       ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12  9:12         ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2005-09-12  9:20           ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12 17:53         ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-14  1:45           ` Nick Rout
2005-09-14  2:21             ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-12  6:39   ` [gentoo-user] [WORKAROUNDED]Nasty " Frank Schafer
2005-09-11 15:05 ` [gentoo-user] Nasty " Hans-Werner Hilse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00d501c5b706$d1f41bd0$0a00a8c0@butthead' \
    --to=dnebinger@joat.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox