public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dave Nebinger" <dnebinger@joat.com>
To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild reports broken libs, should I worry?
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:32:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <003a01c58248$5c686990$5f01010a@jnetlab.lcl> (raw)

On a run of revdep-rebuild I get the following output:

butthead ~ # revdep-rebuild -p

Checking reverse dependencies...
Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by any package update,
will be recompiled.

Collecting system binaries and libraries... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.1_files)

Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.2_ldpath)

Checking dynamic linking consistency...
  broken
/opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.2.2/lib/lib-dynload/_tkinter.so
(requires libtk8.4.so libtcl8.4.so)
  broken
/opt/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk_3.0.1/os/linux/x86/libswt-gnome-gtk
-3063.so (requires libgnomeui-2.so.0 libbonoboui-2.so.0
libgnomecanvas-2.so.0 libgnome-2.so.0 libbonobo-2.so.0 libgconf-2.so.4
libgnomevfs-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libORBit-2.so.0 liblinc.so.1)
  broken /opt/firefox/components/libmozgnome.so (requires libgconf-2.so.4
libORBit-2.so.0 liblinc.so.1 libgnomevfs-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4
libgnome-2.so.0 libbonobo-2.so.0)
  broken /opt/firefox/components/libnkgnomevfs.so (requires
libgnomevfs-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libORBit-2.so.0 liblinc.so.1)
 done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild)

Assigning files to ebuilds... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.4_ebuilds)

Evaluating package order... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.5_order)

Dynamic linking on your system is consistent... All done.


Now the reason for 'broken' is that I don't have gnome installed, that much
I understand.  And I'm cool with the fact that revdep-rebuild didn't try to
install gnome even though these are marked as broken.

The question is, I guess, whether 'broken' has some other meaning than what
I'm thinking, and do I need to be worried?



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



             reply	other threads:[~2005-07-06 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-06 16:32 Dave Nebinger [this message]
2005-07-06 16:49 ` [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild reports broken libs, should I worry? Wade Brown
2005-07-08  4:12   ` Paul Varner
2005-07-06 18:54 ` [gentoo-user] deltup / file sizes Uwe Thiem

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='003a01c58248$5c686990$5f01010a@jnetlab.lcl' \
    --to=dnebinger@joat.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox