From: "Dave Nebinger" <dnebinger@joat.com>
To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild reports broken libs, should I worry?
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:32:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003a01c58248$5c686990$5f01010a@jnetlab.lcl> (raw)
On a run of revdep-rebuild I get the following output:
butthead ~ # revdep-rebuild -p
Checking reverse dependencies...
Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by any package update,
will be recompiled.
Collecting system binaries and libraries... done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.1_files)
Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH... done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.2_ldpath)
Checking dynamic linking consistency...
broken
/opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.2.2/lib/lib-dynload/_tkinter.so
(requires libtk8.4.so libtcl8.4.so)
broken
/opt/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk_3.0.1/os/linux/x86/libswt-gnome-gtk
-3063.so (requires libgnomeui-2.so.0 libbonoboui-2.so.0
libgnomecanvas-2.so.0 libgnome-2.so.0 libbonobo-2.so.0 libgconf-2.so.4
libgnomevfs-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libORBit-2.so.0 liblinc.so.1)
broken /opt/firefox/components/libmozgnome.so (requires libgconf-2.so.4
libORBit-2.so.0 liblinc.so.1 libgnomevfs-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4
libgnome-2.so.0 libbonobo-2.so.0)
broken /opt/firefox/components/libnkgnomevfs.so (requires
libgnomevfs-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libORBit-2.so.0 liblinc.so.1)
done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild)
Assigning files to ebuilds... done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.4_ebuilds)
Evaluating package order... done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.5_order)
Dynamic linking on your system is consistent... All done.
Now the reason for 'broken' is that I don't have gnome installed, that much
I understand. And I'm cool with the fact that revdep-rebuild didn't try to
install gnome even though these are marked as broken.
The question is, I guess, whether 'broken' has some other meaning than what
I'm thinking, and do I need to be worried?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2005-07-06 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-06 16:32 Dave Nebinger [this message]
2005-07-06 16:49 ` [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild reports broken libs, should I worry? Wade Brown
2005-07-08 4:12 ` Paul Varner
2005-07-06 18:54 ` [gentoo-user] deltup / file sizes Uwe Thiem
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003a01c58248$5c686990$5f01010a@jnetlab.lcl' \
--to=dnebinger@joat.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox