From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EI0MM-0002ZP-0g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:53:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8L8kTGb007690; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:46:29 GMT Received: from msg.ecetra.com (dollar.ecetra.com [193.164.224.209]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8L8kSYx014476 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:46:29 GMT Received: from vie-ad01.office.ecetra.com (vie-ad01.office.ecetra.com [10.251.154.12]) by msg.ecetra.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j8L8qPm15441 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:52:25 +0200 Received: from vie-ms01.office.ecetra.com ([10.251.154.11]) by vie-ad01.office.ecetra.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:52:25 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: [gentoo-user-de] Prozessorlast bei LVM2 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:52:23 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [gentoo-user-de] Prozessorlast bei LVM2 Thread-Index: AcW+gg7gyLrJujRfTCeFmEDK0uEU8gAB3k5Q From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D6hler=2C_Alessandro?= To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Sep 2005 08:52:25.0183 (UTC) FILETIME=[C996D6F0:01C5BE89] X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j8L8kSYx014476 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j8L8kTHA007690 X-Archives-Salt: 4069b220-c11b-49d5-ac33-c8fcc528aacb X-Archives-Hash: 54f4fe9ac65761f0e8d4855b18a36197 Also ich habe es auf einem dual P2 450 laufen und hab dann die daten der = volumegroup per nfs freigegeben. Sollte eigentlich keine Performace Probleme geben -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Damm [mailto:lists@sdamm.de]=20 Sent: Mittwoch, 21. September 2005 09:53 To: Gentoo-User-De Subject: [gentoo-user-de] Prozessorlast bei LVM2 Hi, durch einen Plattenschaden hab ich jetzt eine neue drin und auch ein neue= s System. Da ich nat=FCrlich noch nicht wei=DF, wieviel Platz ich wof=FCr= brauche, wollte ich f=FCr home und meine Daten LVM2 verwenden. Hab ich auch eingerichtet, funktioniert.=20 Meine Frage w=E4re aber: Braucht LVM2 deutlich mehr Prozessorkraft, um au= f den gleichen Durchsatz zu kommen wie bei einer ganz normalen Partition?= Oder nimmt sich das quasi nix? Das System ist nur ein P3 450, da k=F6nnt= e das schon was ausmachen. W=E4re sch=F6n, wenn mir da ein LVM2-Benutzer was dazu sagen k=F6nnte. -- Sebastian Damm Blog: http://blog.sdamm.de GPG-Encrypted mail welcome! ID: 0x64D96827 @ pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Fingerprint: CB7F F23F D950 644D 838B 215A 550F 75EC 64D9 6827 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intende= d solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are address= ed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system man= ager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only= for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should = not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. --=20 gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org mailing list