From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JruFz-0000Qv-GI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 12:20:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1FEAE062C; Fri, 2 May 2008 12:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dedi447.your-server.de (dedi447.your-server.de [85.10.215.47]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A7DE062C for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 12:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.122.171.220] (helo=[192.168.1.66]) by dedi447.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JruFw-0005XR-DH for gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 14:20:53 +0200 Message-ID: <481B0720.6040002@skutcher.de> Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 14:20:48 +0200 From: Sascha Moeller User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080423) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user-de] Problem mit Coreutils und mktemp References: <200804302119.42945.Erik.geiger@gmx.de> <481AFD6B.1000306@j-schmitz.net> <481AFE26.5060101@skutcher.de> <200805021401.17769.dirk.heinrichs.ext@nsn.com> <481B03FB.7080409@skutcher.de> <481B05C0.2070507@skutcher.de> In-Reply-To: <481B05C0.2070507@skutcher.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed X-Authenticated-Sender: sascha@skutcher.de X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.91.1/5920/Thu Feb 21 22:44:31 2008) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 75946266-2eab-47c5-9fb5-3b59ad8f8eec X-Archives-Hash: f0d16c999e7844a9c9135c4125923a59 Sascha Moeller schrieb: > Sascha Moeller schrieb: >> Dirk Heinrichs schrieb: >>> Am Freitag, 2. Mai 2008 schrieb ext Sascha Moeller: >>> =20 >>>> Justin schrieb: >>>> =20 >>>>> Sascha Moeller schrieb: >>>>> =20 >>>>>> Juergen Rose schrieb: >>>>>> =20 >>>>>>> On Fr, 2008-05-02 at 13:16 +0200, Sascha Moeller wrote: >>>>>>> =20 >>>>>>>> Hallo Leute, >>>>>>>> wollte mir auf meinem amd64 system grad ne chroot f=FCr 32bit >>>>>>>> basteln. Leider gibt es da nen gro=DFes Problem beim allerersten >>>>>>>> update des Systems: >>>>>>>> tigerente / # emerge -av coreutils >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Calculating dependencies... done! >>>>>>>> [ebuild U ] sys-apps/coreutils-6.10-r2 [6.4] USE=3D"acl nls >>>>>>>> (-selinux) -static -vanilla% -xattr%" 0 kB >>>>>>>> [blocks B ] sys-apps/mktemp (is blocking >>>>>>>> sys-apps/coreutils-6.10-r2) >>>>>>>> [blocks B ] >=3Dsys-apps/coreutils-6.10 (is blocking >>>>>>>> sys-apps/mktemp-1.5) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wenn ich vorher mktemp deinstallieren fliegt mir coreutils, wie=20 >>>>>>>> ich >>>>>>>> es mir schon gedacht hatte, um die Ohren. >>>>>>>> Wie kann ich das sinnvoll beheben? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> MFG Sascha >>>>>>>> =20 >>>>>>> Nach dem Loeschen von mktemp (emerge -C mktemp), konnte ich=20 >>>>>>> coreutils >>>>>>> problemlos installieren. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MfG Juergen >>>>>>> =20 >>>>>> Ich leider nicht :( habs nun genauso gemacht wie Justin es im=20 >>>>>> Falle B >>>>>> gesagt hatte. Und jo Justin komme mit dem Englischen klar :) >>>>>> >>>>>> * checking coreutils-6.10.tar.lzma ;-) >>>>>> ... [ ok ] >>>>>> * checking coreutils-6.10-patches-1.3.tar.lzma ;-) >>>>>> ... [ ok ] >>>>>> >>>>>> =20 >>>>>>>>> Unpacking source... >>>>>>>>> Unpacking coreutils-6.10.tar.lzma to >>>>>>>>> =20 >>>>>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/coreutils-6.10-r2/work >>>>>> unpack coreutils-6.10.tar.lzma: file format not recognized.=20 >>>>>> Ignoring. >>>>>> >>>>>> =20 >>>>>>>>> Unpacking coreutils-6.10-patches-1.3.tar.lzma to >>>>>>>>> =20 >>>>>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/coreutils-6.10-r2/work >>>>>> unpack coreutils-6.10-patches-1.3.tar.lzma: file format not >>>>>> recognized. Ignoring. >>>>>> /usr/portage/sys-apps/coreutils/coreutils-6.10-r2.ebuild: line 50: >>>>>> cd: /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/coreutils-6.10-r2/work/coreutils-6.1= 0: >>>>>> No such file or directory >>>>>> >>>>>> * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is: >>>>>> * >>>>>> * /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/coreutils-6.10-r2/work/patch >>>>>> * ( patch ) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> !!! ERROR: sys-apps/coreutils-6.10-r2 failed. >>>>>> Call stack: >>>>>> ebuild.sh, line 1614: Called dyn_unpack >>>>>> ebuild.sh, line 751: Called qa_call 'src_unpack' >>>>>> environment, line 3791: Called src_unpack >>>>>> coreutils-6.10-r2.ebuild, line 53: Called epatch >>>>>> eutils.eclass, line 181: Called die >>>>>> >>>>>> !!! Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! >>>>>> =20 >>>>> Hast du app-arch/lzma-utils installiert? >>>>> =20 >>>> Jo klar das is installiert, dass dachte ich auch zuerst weil er mit=20 >>>> den >>>> Dateien anscheinend nicht recht was anfangen kann und hatte deshalb=20 >>>> nun >>>> mktemp vermutet >>>> tigerente / # emerge -av lzma-utils >>>> >>>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: >>>> >>>> Calculating dependencies... done! >>>> [ebuild R ] app-arch/lzma-utils-4.32.5 0 kB >>>> =20 >>> >>> Sieh' mal nach, ob Deine portage-Version damit schon umgehen kann: >>> >>> $ cd /usr/lib/portage && grep -R lzma * >>> >>> Sollte Treffer in bin/webrsync und bin/ebuild.sh liefern. Wenn=20 >>> nicht: portage aktualisieren. >>> >>> Bye... >>> >>> Dirk >>> =20 >> >> Cool danke, glaub das war das Problem :) da kam gar keine Ausgabe.=20 >> Ich update grad mal von 2.1.2.2 auf 2.1.4.4, wobei mich dann wundert,=20 >> wieso das selbe Problem auch im 2008.0 beta2 stage3 noch vorhanden ist= . >> >> MFG Sascha > Ok coreutils ging nu durch. Das Problem mit mktemp bleibt aber leider.=20 > Brauch ich mktemp nicht mehr? > tigerente portage # emerge -av mktemp > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild N ] sys-apps/mktemp-1.5 0 kB > [blocks B ] sys-apps/mktemp (is blocking sys-apps/coreutils-6.10-r2= ) > [blocks B ] >=3Dsys-apps/coreutils-6.10 (is blocking=20 > sys-apps/mktemp-1.5) Ok die Website von mktemp gibt mir schon die Antwort dadrauf. Danke euch=20 f=FCr die Hilfe. A different, but compatible, implementation of mktemp is available=20 as part of GNU coreutils . MFG Sascha --=20 gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org mailing list