From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1F0ZYi-0002hX-AT
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:22:44 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0M7JpZ0014228;
	Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:19:51 GMT
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0M7JpTo026474
	for <gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:19:51 GMT
Received: from [80.131.229.145] (helo=minas-morgul)
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis),
	id 0MKwh2-1F0ZVv0IYa-0001bl; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:19:51 +0100
From: Thomas Bruns <newsgroup@donbruno.de>
To: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user-de] revdep-rebuild immer selbe Dateien???
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:19:50 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <200601211903.46970.newsgroup@donbruno.de> <200601211939.00743.nospam001-lists@jankoh.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <200601211939.00743.nospam001-lists@jankoh.dyndns.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user-de+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user-de+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user-de+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user-de.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="cp 850"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200601220819.50208.newsgroup@donbruno.de>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:f07364d5a47193ce6c4e4fe6f706be0a
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k0M7JpTo026474
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k0M7JpZa014228
X-Archives-Salt: 9f559213-c655-483f-a17f-230320847d09
X-Archives-Hash: c4d6fa755df55b2de47427f770466e47

Am Samstag, 21. Januar 2006 19:38 schrieb Jan Kohnert:
> Das ist ein binary-Paket, das kannst du 10 mal neu installieren, und es
> wird trotzdem broken dependencies haben. Du wirst auf ein Update warten
> m=81ssen.
mmhhh im Update ist es bestimmt auch nicht besser dann :-( naja gut

Gruss
THomas

--=20
gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org mailing list