From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJpPj-0006Xj-Gm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:36:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8Q9RV8H031613; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:27:31 GMT Received: from mail02.solnet.ch (mail02.solnet.ch [212.101.4.136]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8Q9RUE0005808 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:27:30 GMT Received: from mail02.solnet.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail02.solnet.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 73496-01-58 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phlogiston (212-41-79-200.adsl.solnet.ch [212.41.79.200]) by mail02.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA285C088 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:34:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Cyrill Helg To: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user-de] Re: Prozessorlast bei LVM2 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:33:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200509261000.10695.linux@solnet.ch> <200509261118.37282.ext-dirk.heinrichs@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <200509261118.37282.ext-dirk.heinrichs@nokia.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509261133.47889.linux@solnet.ch> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail02.solnet.ch X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j8Q9RUE0005808 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j8Q9RV8n031613 X-Archives-Salt: 7458eda5-25a3-46ce-9480-ca7dfcf6362e X-Archives-Hash: d43ea6c0e3da6e9aa8b112d37c0c87e0 Am Montag 26 September 2005 11.18 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs: > Am Montag, 26. September 2005 10:00 schrieb ext Cyrill Helg: > > Nun ja von der Verschl=FCsselung bin ich wieder weg gekommen. Vor all= em > > wegen den Performance einbussen. Wenn ich das machen werde, dann nur > > einen Partition, wo ich geziehlt wichtiges ablegen kann. Gibts > > Benchmarks? > > Ich kann nur sagen, da=DF ich bei meinem Laptop (Pentium M 1,6 GHz, 1Gi= B Ram) > von der Verschl=FCsselung (subjektiv) nichts bemerke. Der einzige Unter= schied > ist eigentlich nur der, da=DF die Devices anders heissen (/dev/mapper/* > statt /dev/evms/*) und Ich beim Booten eine Passphrase angeben mu=DF. Ja das k=F6nnte nerven :) Was f=FCr eine Verschl=FCsselung verwendest du? > > Bye... > > Dirk --=20 gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org mailing list