From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2kfy-0004aV-To for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:06:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7A7521s001889; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:05:02 GMT Received: from john.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de (john.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de [134.109.132.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7A752u7019058 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:05:02 GMT Received: from hjp.envia-tel.net ([80.243.51.38] helo=mail.sdamm.de) by john.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1E2keg-0006HI-Pf for gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:05:39 +0200 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:05:27 +0200 From: Sebastian Damm To: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user-de] Welches Dateisystem auf einem Notebook verwenden? Message-ID: <20050810090527.2134c681@mail.sdamm.de> In-Reply-To: <20050810084152.180ddc91@galadriel.intern.dahlmann.net> References: <42F7D117.5060904@mid.email-server.info> <42F88344.8060405@daniel-faber.de> <200508091827.56192@bwurst.org> <200508092006.10875.matthias@peick.de> <20050810084152.180ddc91@galadriel.intern.dahlmann.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Wed__10_Aug_2005_09_05_27_+0200_x4E0n8kaLJm+1e_D; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Spam-Score: -7.8 (-------) X-Spam-Report: --- Start der SpamAssassin 3.0.4 Textanalyse (-7.8 Punkte) Fragen an/questions to: Postmaster TU Chemnitz -5.0 TUC_AUTH Authentisiert (TUC) -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Nachricht wurde nur ueber vertrauenswuerdige Rechner weitergeleitet --- Ende der SpamAssassin Textanalyse X-Scan-Signature: cb5add96829c288e5da73fa3a8e2275c X-Archives-Salt: 8c41306c-9aeb-4ff8-adf4-f362d1f530d0 X-Archives-Hash: 0f7e1a6a60f5c4995109d94046a46575 --Signature_Wed__10_Aug_2005_09_05_27_+0200_x4E0n8kaLJm+1e_D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hallo, Am 10. August 2005 schrieb Ace Dahlmann: > Warum denn genau? Und wie? Warum? Genau wei=DF ichs auch nicht, aber ich k=F6nnte mir vorstellen, dass eben das System die Kontrolle dar=FCber haben soll, ob und wann Daten auf die Platte geschrieben werden sollen und diese Funktion nicht einer unkontrollierbaren Intelligenz der Hardware =FCberlassen werden soll. Und wie? `hdparm -W 0 /dev/hda` sollte f=FCr die erste Platte helfen. Ciao Sebastian --=20 Sebastian Damm Blog: http://blog.sdamm.de GPG-Encrypted mail welcome! ID: 0x64D96827 @ pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Fingerprint: CB7F F23F D950 644D 838B 215A 550F 75EC 64D9 6827 --Signature_Wed__10_Aug_2005_09_05_27_+0200_x4E0n8kaLJm+1e_D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC+adBVQ917GTZaCcRAlQZAJ0VnmYZjhG1G/FH+DunI2V2BPXBwgCePXdB ShYZkjuX4Row6mCDcnq0Thg= =t2Jr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Wed__10_Aug_2005_09_05_27_+0200_x4E0n8kaLJm+1e_D-- -- gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org mailing list