From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyCyH-0005RL-1r for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:19:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6SIG7Kq010026; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:16:07 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6SIG6o4017372 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:16:07 GMT Received: from www.stonki.com ([213.239.217.135] helo=mail.stonki.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyCvs-0000ry-TH for gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:16:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 9132 invoked by uid 210); 28 Jul 2005 20:18:05 +0200 Received: from 84.143.101.216 by mail (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.24st (clamdscan: 0.85/761. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.24st. Clear:RC:0(84.143.101.216):SA:0(1.9/6.0):. Processed in 4.002575 secs); 28 Jul 2005 18:18:05 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=6.0 X-Spam-Level: + X-Spam-Report: SA TESTS -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 3.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [84.143.101.216 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 3.0 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [84.143.101.216 listed in combined.njabl.org] -1.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Received: from p548f65d8.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO ?192.168.1.251?) (stonki@stonki.de@84.143.101.216) by www.stonki.com with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 20:18:01 +0200 From: Stefan Onken To: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user-de] =?iso-8859-1?q?XFS-Stabilit=E4t?= Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:16:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user-de@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507282016.26638.Support@stonki.de> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j6SIG6o4017372 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j6SIG7LO010026 X-Archives-Salt: 810ad7f7-fb27-4a36-acec-42a2a6b86adb X-Archives-Hash: 804ab337a5ad3a00fea585c09840573f Am Donnerstag, 28. Juli 2005 19:15 schrieb Timo Horstsch=E4fer: > Ist XFS "so" instabil, dass es keinen Absturz "=FCberlebt" oder > liegt das evtl. an meinem Kernel? > In vielen Foren liest man, dass XFS keine Probleme macht. also XFS laeuft bei mir lokal und auf ca. 6 Servern seit Monaten (>=20 15) stabil und hat auch schon manchen Stromausfall bzw. ausschalten=20 des Clientrechners ohne jede noch so kleine Macke ueberlebt. Schau mal nach, ob die anderen Komponenten alle noch stimmen.=20 Stichwort RAM ist schon gefallen, aber auch Kabel, Mainboard etc. cu stonki --=20 www.stonki.de: the more I see, the more I know....... www.proftpd.de: Deutsche ProFTPD Dokumentation www.krename.net: Der Batch Renamer f=FCr KDE www.kbarcode.net: Die Barcode Solution f=FCr KDE --=20 gentoo-user-de@gentoo.org mailing list