From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Q7G-0000B4-3T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:01:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5D641C0A6; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE99D1C0A6 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so2926788vws.40 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:00:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=La3VIrRr10uzrSEVJOm55kfQO5rtN6RqB2wa5+aTpE0=; b=Qp/dlFulrxlJlkqfgf31lHyAvRmqMIK5H8zH7oeKPW5rCpkluUsUae56edsQE0JyFK gfanGunZr5SJEYEO+zfzzdtFp+liX6OzTYHu26v8RY63WQjokD2uZQFs+pgt9yNbQDKx pqoL5MwK1kfH/l1IVZ0OBh30jrH+shNi2mJKc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=EYgx4h5fOqii1gLjZFGgeeqU23dfRPUHvh8yRGfjhKQAX4X7rBJjXfpilG/1Kq5taP NHTd9wVY5vkZcPX1HmSr8dA80ehDaHdpFVJ1bH4Yu/9lSv2vYehbXVhGVz3SAM5PhxaX NQDR1SSJ16LTjW4O66xc0JQOC0ctaAGYDY/Lk= Received: by 10.52.0.142 with SMTP id 14mr6598541vde.247.1301371255102; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user-br@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user-br@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: pablonhess@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.156.129 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:00:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1301324213.2017.15.camel@geekland> References: <677506.8899.qm@web36704.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D8F9603.1010607@yahoo.com.br> <1301324213.2017.15.camel@geekland> From: Pablo Hess Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 01:00:35 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: F4FPsaQN-cGPDw8TBJ367E51oSs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user-br] Dilema gentoo 32bits vs 64bits To: gentoo-user-br@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: ec05049a72cc3b379c2dc4fbc8c3fe0d Uma abordagem muito interessante nesse dilema 32 vs 64 bits =C3=A9 a do Fedora: o kernel =C3=A9 64 bits e o userland =C3=A9 32 bits. Com isso, voc= =C3=AA tem os benef=C3=ADcios do mapeamento de mem=C3=B3ria direto em 64 bits, mas os programas para 32 bits n=C3=A3o chiam. No Gentoo, fazer isso exigiria uma s=C3=A9rie de gambiarras, pois a compila=C3=A7=C3=A3o do kernel precisaria das bibliotecas em vers=C3=A3o 64= bits, enquanto que o restante do sistema usaria as mesmas bibliotecas (e muitas outras) em 32 bits. =C3=89, em alguns casos as distribui=C3=A7=C3=B5es bin=C3=A1rias t=C3=AAm v= antagem.