From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPekq-00087B-Gn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:12:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74274E0330; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web54408.mail.yahoo.com (web54408.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.138]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D423E0330 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90506 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Jan 2009 15:12:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=a/8J3RC2gZSLuqoEZnh9mzTeRLBQb3S/IoaCWP4Ht34/+IpErIrwj3oMTXZQhKYbBaCYN0cPHjblhl2kCXYqEdqRLti7nbv1Qj909jDeiorIr2voN4zZquDrD7E1/K0eg/0ZibTf9kbrPLJd+izUQvDprLV5Z0vPzlu15JgH5Gg=; X-YMail-OSG: _1p5lxUVM1lW9ej5T7CQuSplEhSNKeuNQP5lAz4niMkXx9xvAM0IA4.owzoO9MhigP65fXG6baVlhMXsukY_ZPiYqicU1hcbxee761kirDHhysYOxhPOyqzhOnM7TTYUd0xufFS332vhUGsQKgM0TsxjA12meEqe.9z8Qg_TywFi5Py3kD6z.mjJ.yLIOiJy6J01GUXpLwOQ38g4_oHB6_gFu4woQg-- Received: from [189.25.44.85] by web54408.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:12:29 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:12:29 -0800 (PST) From: O Andarilho Subject: Re: [gentoo-user-br] Ativar efeitos no kde4.1 To: gentoo-user-br@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <49773172.2050503@bastosservice.com.br> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user-br@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user-br@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <517148.86225.qm@web54408.mail.yahoo.com> X-Archives-Salt: a29b7bbf-5e48-41ad-b3e8-989a4d23d872 X-Archives-Hash: e6dc6b8696f95579e6c1f33e7a282732 --- Em qua, 21/1/09, Raphael Bastos escre= veu: > ae galera, por curiosidade compilei o mesa-7.2 e observei > que caiu MUITO > o desempenho em rela=E7=E3o =E0 vers=E3o 7.0.3 (n=E3o sei > porque) >=20 > take a look: >=20 > chemonz@gentoo-dell ~ $ glxgears > Failed to initialize TTM buffer manager. Falling back to > classic. > do_wait: drmWaitVBlank returned -1, IRQs don't seem to > be working correctly. > Try adjusting the vblank_mode configuration parameter. > 292 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 58.251 FPS > 301 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 60.114 FPS > 301 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 60.111 FPS >=20 >=20 > e observe antes, com a vers=E3o 7.0.3: >=20 > chemonz@gentoo-dell ~ $ glxgears >=20 > 99752 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 19949.219 FPS >=20 > 106953 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 21390.429 FPS >=20 > 112547 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 22509.306 FPS >=20 >=20 > logo informo que vou voltar pra vers=E3o 7.0.3 AGORA. > hahhahaha > algu=E9m fez algum teste de desempenho parecido com as > vers=F5es do MESA? cara, continuo abismado e cabreiro com esses teus resultados em tua placa g= r=E1fica Intel (sem ofensas :) ).. Eu n=E3o obtive nenhuma diferen=E7a de desempenho com o upgrade do mesa. E continuo sem entender como a minha GeForce 8600GS 512MB PCI-E est=E1 perd= endo da tua Intel.. ser=E1 que =E9 pq eu n=E3o uso DRI? Em algum momento eu= li que com nvidia n=E3o deveria usar..... =0A=0A=0A Veja quais s=E3o os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados= =0Ahttp://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com