From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Frm4R-0005ph-Ul for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:27:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5I1RMof018888; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:27:22 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5I1RLPu004724 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:27:21 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.219] (ip68-102-201-166.ks.ok.cox.net [68.102.201.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750AC64B85 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4494ABF4.5090808@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:27:16 -0500 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060530) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Recent issues (funding/etc) References: <44943CED.4080805@gentoo.org> <200606171556.01871.jhuebel@gentoo.org> <449479BF.4010305@gentoo.org> <1150593674.10084.2.camel@localhost> <4494AA93.7010605@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4494AA93.7010605@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4128190996AE107F4483F979" X-Archives-Salt: 367c0882-2cd5-4fa9-a1f0-7b707f947e92 X-Archives-Hash: c5a950e6956b5a3aab70c83d1c7a61b6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4128190996AE107F4483F979 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Seemant Kulleen wrote: >> Some of the pending items: do we want to include in the general voting= : >> the actual *size* of the board. I remember Grant had mentioned onlist= >> that the board could do with downsizing anyway to 5 or 7 members. I >> personally agree with that assessment. >> >> Anyone else have anything to say about it? =20 >=20 > Yeah, hopefully that way only people with more time will do it. Plus it would mean less people needed for a majority vote. For me 7 makes sense. I'd be worried about 5 with too many duties that are needed (or may be needed). --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig4128190996AE107F4483F979 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFElKv0QW+hXSf0t0IRArLvAJ4xCIknsF96ddaFnQ++60hdnw6omgCgrTcP fya8+zI3E8x1tF/EeLJ55zM= =tLH5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4128190996AE107F4483F979-- -- gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org mailing list