public inbox for gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Re: Request for funds
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:24:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4331EBC1.30106@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050921140927.GM11142@mail.lieber.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1990 bytes --]

Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:26:35AM -0400 or thereabouts, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> 
>>>My fear is that the moment we start to help a dev in need, there will be devs 
>>>in need all over.  What, then, becomes the criteria for selecting Dev A but 
>>>rejecting Dev B?  If that becomes sketchy then the complaint could be made 
>>>(to the IRS) that the Gentoo Foundation is no longer operating in the public 
>>>interest.
>>
>>I was not referring to power bills and such.  I was actually thinking of
>>burnt harddrives, cpus, memory sticks etc.  Such things can be purchased
>>and sent (and thus moneys tracked).  In other words, my statement was
>>about things rather than cash.  Having said that, it is entirely
>>possible that it would be a slippery slope with a lot of devs suddenly
>>in need, but I tend to think people are basically good and that that
>>won't happen.
> 
> 
> In general, I don't support the notion of buying things for individuals,
> for many of the reasons Corey already articulated, but also because I don't
> think that such targeted purchases are really the best way to disburse our
> funds.
> 
> I want to see the Foundation sending developers to conferences where they
> can answer user questions, get a better feel for what our community really
> wants, etc.  Broad-reaching type stuff.  I agree that providing a stick of
> RAM to a developer has tangible benefit to Gentoo, but I'd rather see that
> handled via other means.  (private donations, etc.)

(Sorry for my late response)

I'd have to agree with Kurt here as well. I would rather see things that
are more broad reaching in helping Gentoo than offering things
individually.

Maybe we should get an ad in the NYTimes like mozilla did ;-) (j/k).

-- 
Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager

---
GPG Public Key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742

ramereth/irc.freenode.net

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-21 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <432DBF3F.9070305@gentoo.org>
     [not found] ` <200509201610.45671.cshields@gentoo.org>
     [not found]   ` <4330CDA8.6040301@gentoo.org>
     [not found]     ` <200509210316.40125.cshields@gentoo.org>
2005-09-21 11:26       ` [gentoo-trustees] Re: Request for funds Seemant Kulleen
2005-09-21 14:09         ` Kurt Lieber
2005-09-21 23:24           ` Lance Albertson [this message]
2005-09-23 15:15             ` Sven Vermeulen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4331EBC1.30106@gentoo.org \
    --to=ramereth@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox