From: Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Re: Request for funds
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:24:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4331EBC1.30106@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050921140927.GM11142@mail.lieber.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1990 bytes --]
Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:26:35AM -0400 or thereabouts, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
>
>>>My fear is that the moment we start to help a dev in need, there will be devs
>>>in need all over. What, then, becomes the criteria for selecting Dev A but
>>>rejecting Dev B? If that becomes sketchy then the complaint could be made
>>>(to the IRS) that the Gentoo Foundation is no longer operating in the public
>>>interest.
>>
>>I was not referring to power bills and such. I was actually thinking of
>>burnt harddrives, cpus, memory sticks etc. Such things can be purchased
>>and sent (and thus moneys tracked). In other words, my statement was
>>about things rather than cash. Having said that, it is entirely
>>possible that it would be a slippery slope with a lot of devs suddenly
>>in need, but I tend to think people are basically good and that that
>>won't happen.
>
>
> In general, I don't support the notion of buying things for individuals,
> for many of the reasons Corey already articulated, but also because I don't
> think that such targeted purchases are really the best way to disburse our
> funds.
>
> I want to see the Foundation sending developers to conferences where they
> can answer user questions, get a better feel for what our community really
> wants, etc. Broad-reaching type stuff. I agree that providing a stick of
> RAM to a developer has tangible benefit to Gentoo, but I'd rather see that
> handled via other means. (private donations, etc.)
(Sorry for my late response)
I'd have to agree with Kurt here as well. I would rather see things that
are more broad reaching in helping Gentoo than offering things
individually.
Maybe we should get an ad in the NYTimes like mozilla did ;-) (j/k).
--
Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
ramereth/irc.freenode.net
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-21 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <432DBF3F.9070305@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <200509201610.45671.cshields@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <4330CDA8.6040301@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <200509210316.40125.cshields@gentoo.org>
2005-09-21 11:26 ` [gentoo-trustees] Re: Request for funds Seemant Kulleen
2005-09-21 14:09 ` Kurt Lieber
2005-09-21 23:24 ` Lance Albertson [this message]
2005-09-23 15:15 ` Sven Vermeulen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4331EBC1.30106@gentoo.org \
--to=ramereth@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox