From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ns1.osuosl.org (ns1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3BHmdO0012337; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:48:39 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6DABBFF6; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11140-87; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [140.211.166.156] (washington.osuosl.org [140.211.166.156]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DB6BBEC0; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <425AB8E8.8040502@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:50:32 -0700 From: Corey Shields <cshields@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-trustees+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-trustees+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-trustees+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-trustees.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-core@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-trustees] Re: [gentoo-core] Upcoming elections References: <20050411033257.GK27926@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <425AB667.3090800@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <425AB667.3090800@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: d7a7dbde-1a51-4cd7-b0db-b126cd349f13 X-Archives-Hash: f45f8033bdb58868a47e3ac1249623ce Stuart Herbert wrote: > Why not put in place automatic membership for all developers / > documenters / infra monkeys who have completed their probation period? > > Best regards, > Stu This would be ideal, but my concern is getting people to vote who don't care to vote but were added as Foundation members by default. This may not be an issue depending on how the voting is setup (having a timed vote versus a quorum vote). Cheers, -C -- Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields -- gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org mailing list