From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EK3yl-0006fl-Nv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:09:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8R12vNk017904; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:02:57 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8R12vQ1028721 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:02:57 GMT Received: from adsl-70-241-79-204.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net ([70.241.79.204] helo=localhost) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EK3yj-0002VT-I0 for gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:09:53 +0000 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:09:53 -0500 From: Grant Goodyear To: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Re: Question about "g" logo usage Message-ID: <20050927010953.GD29090@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org References: <000601c5bb67$04ecf1b0$2101a8c0@casafcac507fb0> <20050925182017.GG13134@gentoo.org> <200509260922.36163.cshields@gentoo.org> <200509260938.19880.cshields@gentoo.org> <20050927005005.GC29090@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050927005005.GC29090@dst.grantgoodyear.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Archives-Salt: 39691e89-44f8-4ced-90d6-df81c0a361ad X-Archives-Hash: ef3bdeb532c9287551a2f4bba8f58c0b --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Grant Goodyear wrote: [Mon Sep 26 2005, 07:50:05PM CDT] > My own small-amount-of-change: I don't mind commercial folks using our > logo, but I think they should license it. Now that doesn't necessarily > mean that actual money needs to be involved, but permission needs to be > sought, and the time needs to be limited (with, of course, the option to > renew the license). I think we need that much to maintain the Gentoo > trademark(s), although that question should really be run by the legal > folks for confirmation. Oh, I also wanted to ask if there's a reason we don't have this discussion on -nfp? To the best of my knowledge -trustees still isn't archived, so it would be best if we had as many conversations out in the open as possible. -g2boojum- --=20 Grant Goodyear=09 Gentoo Developer g2boojum@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDOJvhptxxUuD2W3YRAqfMAKCCUPq86LYCnVHlNIdH7uILjnsJEwCeJjxe 8YWyBfVmePIet5D82WGdSTU= =UkM/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8-- -- gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org mailing list