From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dseic-0002A8-Jy for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:43:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6DAgvqF004822; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:42:57 GMT Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be (adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6DAguXn004238 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:42:56 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id D823444289 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:43:56 +0200 (MEST) Received: from daikan.siphos.be (dD5767384.access.telenet.be [213.118.115.132]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAE64416B for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:43:56 +0200 (MEST) Received: by daikan.siphos.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9AEF612C6CE; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:43:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:43:41 +0200 From: Sven Vermeulen To: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright stuff Message-ID: <20050713104341.GA10485@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 37e55271-e6dd-4b8d-8455-407f63e9db8c X-Archives-Hash: 62a7cbbf9a444bef368d73c37ad56882 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:58:56PM -0700, Deedra Waters wrote: > 2. it would be a co-ownership basically, meaning thatif i wrote > documentation or parts of documentation, i would retain the rights to > those docs, but gentoo owns the entire thing. >=20 > 3. only gentoo would have the ability to sue. This is more a legal > thing, but basically it's so that if we ever had to go into law to > defend the copyright, the other person can't force us to drag all of > our developers into court. This would be perfect, sort-of an exclusive license.=20 Wkr, Sven Vermeulen --=20 Documentation project leader - Gentoo Foundation Trustee The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>> --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC1PBdXfqz7M26L9sRAnxAAJ99ncon/BWP3SfBglhac2CVZTtKGQCZAeLd fGsN2TNI4ysPd1558S5o26Y= =VUcb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- -- gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org mailing list