public inbox for gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@gentoo.org>
To: Ulrich Plate <plate@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-trustees] Re: Next GWN
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:47:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050617034743.GA16272@dst.grantgoodyear.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050615120724.1235d292.plate@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2127 bytes --]

> I'm trying to get in gear for next week's GWN, and I'd like to cover
> what we've been discussing on -core in a double-whammy sort of way: The
> main news section should carry a nice little article about the transfer
> of the copyright to the Foundation and the legal implications of that
> move, sort of a general wrap-up of everything that's been going on at
> Foundation level, including the transition of power over the store, the
> new trustees' agenda for the coming year and so on. It doesn't have to
> be long, but I'd be really grateful if you could do that for us, or get
> one of the other trustees to write something. 

I'm sorry, I just don't have the time to do it justice right now,
although I'll pass this e-mail on to the trustees in case anybody wants
to step up.  I'm happy to answer any questions, but somebody else will
have to write the actual press release.

> As to Daniel's new employment, I'm going to ask him for an interview,
> with questions inspired by what he said last night in #gentoo-dev. The
> idea his to give him an opportunity for a personal statement, rather
> than us stating it for him. I'm sure his answers will help defuse the
> whole stupid "OMG we're selling out" type of atmosphere that's been
> reigning over the more irrational parts of the community. 

It's a good idea, although my suspicion is that by the time the GWN
comes out things will have diffused appropriately.  We've had a nice bit
of press about the issue from nearly-reputable sources, and some of the
facts have even been correct!

> I also wanted to tell you that I was really impressed by your message
> to -core. There aren't many devs on that list who'd know how to
> apologize for anything at all, you know... Thanks a lot!

*Grin*  You're quite welcome, although I also think you're a bit
cynical.  Over the last however-many years I've seen quite a number of
good apologies on -dev and -core!

-g2boojum-
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@gentoo.org
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

           reply	other threads:[~2005-06-17  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20050615120724.1235d292.plate@gentoo.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050617034743.GA16272@dst.grantgoodyear.org \
    --to=g2boojum@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=plate@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox