[gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Lance Albertson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 629 bytes --]

Hey all,

Just letting you know that I have access to all domains related to
Gentoo that Daniel had via a GoDaddy account. We need to get Grant's
phone number on there and update a few other info when we get a chance.
The major thing right now is updating the credit card for domain
renewal. (Namely if we want to keep *games.* which expired a week or so
ago)

Cheers, 

-- 
Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager

---
Public GPG key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742

ramereth/irc.freenode.net

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Nicholas Jones]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 65 bytes --]


gentoo*games* is already on the aftermarket bid system.

--NJ



[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Lance Albertson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 610 bytes --]

On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 11:05 -0400, Nicholas Jones wrote:
> gentoo*games* is already on the aftermarket bid system.

Accordign to daniel, GoDaddy will hold them for a few weeks (which is
pretty damn close right now) until it tries to get a credit card that
works. So if we want to keep these domains for any reason, we should act
very soon (within days).

-- 
Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager

---
GPG Public Key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742

ramereth/irc.freenode.net

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Nicholas Jones]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 506 bytes --]

> Accordign to daniel, GoDaddy will hold them for a few weeks (which is
> pretty damn close right now) until it tries to get a credit card that
> works. So if we want to keep these domains for any reason, we should act
> very soon (within days).

Very odd auction system if that's so... I don't like either
version of it...

I want to keep at least gentoo{,-}games.org. I've been trying to
get a group concensus, but there hasn't been much vocal support
or opposition.

I'd prefer to keep them all.

--NJ


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Corey Shields]

Nicholas Jones wrote:

>I want to keep at least gentoo{,-}games.org. I've been trying to
>get a group concensus, but there hasn't been much vocal support
>or opposition.
>
>I'd prefer to keep them all.
>  
>

this is what I had to say last time this came up for those who missed it:

From: Corey Shields <cshields@gentoo.org>
To: trustees@gentoo.org
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 13:18:25 -0700


On Monday 09 May 2005 12:34 pm, you wrote:
> gentoo{,-}games.{com,net,org}
> Anyway... Need opinions quickly.

While I agree that they are a good demonstration of Gentoo technologies (in 
this case, catalyst), I don't know that a domain is necessary to show them 
off.  Especially, in this case, domains that have pointed to a blank page for 
some time now. If there is an awesome livecd for a game, then we should 
showboat that somewhere under www.gentoo.org/  (I'm holding out for 
catalyst-mame that makes a cd with your roms)  :)

I just see some issues with this in the future:

- having to pay for the domains (vs just using www.gentoo.org, or 
games.gentoo.org in this case)
- other groups wanting their own domain to showboat their product.  Pretty 
soon we could have gentoo-hardened.{com,net,org}, gentoo-embedded, etc. etc.   
gets to be sticky from an infra point of view, too.

When the -games domains were purchased, their purpose was to make a seperate 
entity (corporate at the time).  I don't see why we should seperate Gentoo 
products like that..   Give them a space in *.gentoo.org and if they need 
more exposure, highlight them on the main website.

> Gentoo.org needs to be transfered this month. Need to figure out
> who pays, who owns, where the bills go, and how we transfer it.
> Again... we could probably use some opinions here. I suppose we
> could just dump it on Infra. Who's maintaining Gentoo's assets?

This could get sticky, we don't have much experience with money going out 
yet.  :)    If the register that gentoo.org uses takes paypal, we can do that 
easily.  Could you look into that?

<snip>

Thanks Nick!

Cheers!

-- 
Corey Shields
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields


-- 
gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Grant Goodyear]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1013 bytes --]

Carpaski wrote: [Sat May 21 2005, 11:22:53AM CDT]
> > Accordign to daniel, GoDaddy will hold them for a few weeks (which is
> > pretty damn close right now) until it tries to get a credit card that
> > works. So if we want to keep these domains for any reason, we should act
> > very soon (within days).
> 
> Very odd auction system if that's so... I don't like either
> version of it...
> 
> I want to keep at least gentoo{,-}games.org. I've been trying to
> get a group concensus, but there hasn't been much vocal support
> or opposition.
> 
> I'd prefer to keep them all.

I'm actually fairly ambivalent, but I think we should hang on to
whatever we can right now.  If we decide to let some domains lapse, I'd
rather it be because we choose to do so, and I don't think we're ready
to make that decision right now.

-g2boojum-
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@gentoo.org
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Lance Albertson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1460 bytes --]

On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 17:05 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Carpaski wrote: [Sat May 21 2005, 11:22:53AM CDT]
> > > Accordign to daniel, GoDaddy will hold them for a few weeks (which is
> > > pretty damn close right now) until it tries to get a credit card that
> > > works. So if we want to keep these domains for any reason, we should act
> > > very soon (within days).
> > 
> > Very odd auction system if that's so... I don't like either
> > version of it...
> > 
> > I want to keep at least gentoo{,-}games.org. I've been trying to
> > get a group concensus, but there hasn't been much vocal support
> > or opposition.
> > 
> > I'd prefer to keep them all.
> 
> I'm actually fairly ambivalent, but I think we should hang on to
> whatever we can right now.  If we decide to let some domains lapse, I'd
> rather it be because we choose to do so, and I don't think we're ready
> to make that decision right now.

I obviously have no voting powers yet, but I'd like for us to at least
renew this now and decide later if we want to keep them long term. Can
the current votable members please decide whether to do this or not? And
if we do it, how we'll do it? (It needs a CC).

Cheers,

-- 
Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager

---
GPG Public Key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742

ramereth/irc.freenode.net

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Fwd: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Corey Shields]

sent this with the wrong from: address at first, so I'm trying it again...

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral
Date: Sunday 22 May 2005 05:23 pm
From: Corey Shields <cshields@osuosl.org>
To: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org

On Sunday 22 May 2005 03:56 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
> I obviously have no voting powers yet, but I'd like for us to at least
> renew this now and decide later if we want to keep them long term. Can
> the current votable members please decide whether to do this or not? And
> if we do it, how we'll do it? (It needs a CC).
>
> Cheers,

I was the only one openly opposed to it, but given the short time we have
versus the long discussion ahead regarding it, I'll vote to keep it..

(yeah, as it stands it will need a vote of 7 to spend money on it...  there
may be exceptions to that in the future, dunno..  something to keep in mind)

-C

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Corey Shields
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields
-- 
gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: Fwd: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Sven Vermeulen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 681 bytes --]

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:11:10PM -0700, Corey Shields wrote:
> sent this with the wrong from: address at first, so I'm trying it again...
[...]
> I was the only one openly opposed to it, but given the short time we have
> versus the long discussion ahead regarding it, I'll vote to keep it..

My archive states that Paul also didn't see why we would keep them.

If it is a voting you want, I vote in favor. A domain name doesn't cost that
much and there is clearly interest in it (even not in the short time frame).

Wkr,
      Sven Vermeulen

-- 
  Documentation project leader - Gentoo Foundation Trustee

  The Gentoo Project   <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Fwd: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral

[Paul de Vrieze]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 857 bytes --]

On Monday 23 May 2005 10:11, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:11:10PM -0700, Corey Shields wrote:
> > sent this with the wrong from: address at first, so I'm trying it
> > again...
>
> [...]
>
> > I was the only one openly opposed to it, but given the short time we
> > have versus the long discussion ahead regarding it, I'll vote to keep
> > it..
>
> My archive states that Paul also didn't see why we would keep them.

I'm indeed rather ambivalent towards them. I don't see the point in having 
them. On the other hand it doesn't cost much so I don't see a big problem 
in delaying the decision. My term ends at the 30th, but otherwise I would 
be willing to be convinced of reasons to keep them structurally.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]