From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4MMuAPw023163 for ; Sun, 22 May 2005 22:56:10 GMT Received: from [12.40.38.180] (helo=pursuit) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DZzMg-00060J-Qm; Sun, 22 May 2005 22:56:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Godaddy account transferral From: Lance Albertson To: Grant Goodyear Cc: gentoo-trustees@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050521220552.GC10021@server.grantgoodyear.org> References: <1116641311.9292.4.camel@mirage.ramereth.lan> <20050521150538.GA11570@twobit.net> <1116691676.31658.2.camel@pursuit> <20050521162253.GA12716@twobit.net> <20050521220552.GC10021@server.grantgoodyear.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-x/qJTuYpDH28zXFC20S2" Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 17:56:10 -0500 Message-Id: <1116802570.18599.59.camel@pursuit> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 X-Archives-Salt: c28448bc-d761-400a-a1bc-92b96a257af3 X-Archives-Hash: 548f0d1fd19e4626b584345ed8f33221 --=-x/qJTuYpDH28zXFC20S2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 17:05 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: > Carpaski wrote: [Sat May 21 2005, 11:22:53AM CDT] > > > Accordign to daniel, GoDaddy will hold them for a few weeks (which is > > > pretty damn close right now) until it tries to get a credit card that > > > works. So if we want to keep these domains for any reason, we should = act > > > very soon (within days). > >=20 > > Very odd auction system if that's so... I don't like either > > version of it... > >=20 > > I want to keep at least gentoo{,-}games.org. I've been trying to > > get a group concensus, but there hasn't been much vocal support > > or opposition. > >=20 > > I'd prefer to keep them all. >=20 > I'm actually fairly ambivalent, but I think we should hang on to > whatever we can right now. If we decide to let some domains lapse, I'd > rather it be because we choose to do so, and I don't think we're ready > to make that decision right now. I obviously have no voting powers yet, but I'd like for us to at least renew this now and decide later if we want to keep them long term. Can the current votable members please decide whether to do this or not? And if we do it, how we'll do it? (It needs a CC). Cheers, --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --=-x/qJTuYpDH28zXFC20S2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCkQ4KQW+hXSf0t0IRAlfGAJ9aaFb+kzidl2lPxtShFP+dEthY4QCg6YN6 g6MdJSTbmg8i7kZHyKGSaZI= =wWWi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-x/qJTuYpDH28zXFC20S2-- -- gentoo-trustees@gentoo.org mailing list