From: Zhitong He <hezhit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-soc] Network Configuration in Gentoo
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:33:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <w2jf87449c71004060233y37fa928eof4e69b64d60770f2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2018 bytes --]
Hi, I have been trying to get involved with NetworkManager's integration
with Gentoo, but encounter some problems.
1. What network configuration in Gentoo does are not what NM can do.
Modular Networking in Gentoo is popular, however, they are not all
supported by NM. For example, bonding, bridging and vlan. In addition,
advanced configuration such as interface dependency, fall back operation,
are not supported by NM, too.
2. Configuration about Wireless Networking is not powerful enough.
Security wireless connection is a strong point of NM, however, not the
network configuration of Gentoo. Though we can choose wpa_supplicant module
for security connection, the configuration depends on wpa_supplicant's
configuration files which has its own syntax and not worth translation back
to NM using plugin, since NM is already working with wpa_supplicant via dbus
communication.
So, what's the benefit for Gentoo and what I can do if choosing the
project?
Working with syntax in network configuration file like config_<interface>
and config_<essid> is pleasure, but is that enough? they are only little
part of Gentoo's network configuration file. The work should focus on
settings for NM, but settings in Gentoo's network configuration rely on
various tools according to different modules and the syntax is not unified.
Will mentor let me pass the final evaluation if only part of the
configuration is support? :-)
My conclusion is that we should do more work on improving the way to
configure network in Gentoo instead of NM integration, if we need to make it
easily supported by various network control daemon. For example, focus on
settings for variable control like /etc/make.conf instead of syntax as
wpa_supplicant_wlan0="-Dwext", put it from a single file(/etc/conf.d/net) to
a specified directory, where we can also place the vpn keys, pem files..
Sorry for my poor English, I would explain further if you could not
understand my opinion. Feedback and comments are welcome.
--
Zhitong He
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2255 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-06 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-06 9:33 Zhitong He [this message]
2010-04-06 10:01 ` [gentoo-soc] Network Configuration in Gentoo Rahul Jain
2010-04-06 11:36 ` Zhitong He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=w2jf87449c71004060233y37fa928eof4e69b64d60770f2@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hezhit@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox