From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019FF1381F3 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85C3AE0953; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6077E0953 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m19so5463822wev.8 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:19:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ChFXx8ZNoGpFARr9xzqC3QFspICnUts7Egeah05zm58=; b=E2d4Y1F02ebHgHT6crtwmADgPWPRS+V32jeC2eLuTTuB4ahAUUEJ/BVjbCrbuz/vBe 2+/iJkt94UysYC7vDY79Eh6a5v0Y2s1kC7OECFYDT+04bUNV6dddrpSAPxqqLk545T7q TOui8oUGaSI6X3Z/fDAn6XrTA0h5VrnrQN5CC3rT29xsYKrW8iVBiJwwnU5u6SIhMXiy NU5RDw+3dDUQwukta7WlYo4+NWCH0GFGxrAXtyMwdm/Ta/3HkxFRs+NtjCavbWSlanji RDCuFA1EGPaCkpU33N0clOggBFlLIYx8zcC+xfS4pAVT/lg0PK713NJ59zzGvmUu/iOf /uUA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.10.138 with SMTP id i10mr28730715wib.53.1374477585605; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.228.132 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:19:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51D19FDF.9080004@gentoo.org> References: <87mwq6mj4v.fsf@proton.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp> <51D1995A.8050707@gentoo.org> <87bo6mmhqj.fsf@proton.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp> <51D19FDF.9080004@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:19:45 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Gentoo on Android, Summary for 2013.6.28-7.1 From: Benda Xu To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c218ae3de99204e2148071 X-Archives-Salt: 35d92d1a-380b-4590-8ab4-64a7b6010b29 X-Archives-Hash: 4109863e4bc545519887f89f42d4ab0f --001a11c218ae3de99204e2148071 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear Luca, On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Luca Barbato wrote: > > The patch itself is partially wrong (you might want to use a totally > different layout) but surely looks interesting. > I'd like to revisit this topic. Could you please be a bit more specific on where it is partially wrong? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01904.html -- XU Benda Research Center for Neutrino Science Tohoku University JAPAN http://www.awa.tohoku.ac.jp/~benda --001a11c218ae3de99204e2148071 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Luca,

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Luca Barbato <lu_zer= o@gentoo.org> wrote:

The patch itself is partially wrong (you might want to use a to= tally
different layout) but surely looks interesting.

I'd like to revisit this topic. Could you please be a bit more= specific on where it is partially wrong?

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches= /2011-01/msg01904.html

--
XU Benda
Research Center for Neutrino Science
= Tohoku University
JAPAN

http://www.awa.tohoku.ac.jp/~benda
--001a11c218ae3de99204e2148071--