From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196A2138010 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA360E09D8 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D79E0730 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so2402233bkw.40 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:12:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Nk7euCoZu2/G8On9rBHs2PBNVcOiwhbGqXK2DKhvLjQ=; b=Qv3DR249gmNfTJQYiBuUwasidV7pPREbq0MnPtO2DYvbI2pPr3EZXs3b7P7tfixwfW oJgzOyDk2eac451X2NgwA3g83BqX03VtOEsgTiKRNleBrBNJkzrxFuRTxbLKSQ3FtHHI JJrlCDLkQ3ib8q2qroNRjjdjkWw/Ad71u0ADUqgBuooZIbg4wTJHsBfPmtjGZC86472x 91Vkec4k/0bV4uRf46qvnkc2umplKfp/89A6tXX6X36u+YtSdavepjeevDyxJWmROGNZ kHCm6kN5IBKkkaaw/nq7OV3y49lX0J1U+qH9EPAB6ReGoc5fnjybgmYgz5SNGj3rojgm TTjA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.145.76 with SMTP id c12mr4771045bkv.70.1345486377591; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.14.76 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:12:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50326714.6000603@gentoo.org> References: <86wr1tcz8f.fsf@gmail.com> <86d333cngt.fsf@gmail.com> <5020DD0A.3030506@gentoo.org> <86ipct6k80.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <50235319.5000504@gentoo.org> <867gt75uab.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5024CB9F.4060906@gentoo.org> <86y5lml15i.fsf_-_@gentoo.org> <86vcgpj8d8.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5028BBBE.6060109@gentoo.org> <861uj8faqh.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <502C1903.1090805@gentoo.org> <86628jdyf6.fsf@gmail.com> <86y5leaxhd.fsf@gmail.com> <502DF2C5.5090209@gentoo.org> <86haryqn5x.fsf@gmail.com> <5031F272.3060907@gentoo.org> <50326714.6000603@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:12:57 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zwCMrlhpj3OJY3NvNF3_9OWPCro Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012 From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 758a35f2-4c3a-44ff-acd3-91bbc35a2b85 X-Archives-Hash: aa26e85eac073a39d753975d22d9e7aa On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 8/20/12 12:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> Seems like the best comparisons are between linux-based systems of >> identical configuration. Crossing OS boundaries might also be useful >> but obviously you aren't going to be testing systemd that way. > > > I do not care about systemd at all. I care about fixing a problem in what > I'm using. If openrc is really slow on reboot and boot I'd like to figure > out why it isn't for me. (compared to the OS touted as the best for user > experience.) Well, if you're comparing OSX to Linux+OpenRC there are a LOT of variables - one could be faster for any number of reasons. If you compare systemd to OpenRC you can figure out what is possible on Linux. Being as good as OSX is a non-starter for me. If I thought Gentoo was as good as OSX I wouldn't be using it... Rich