From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D831381F4 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 084EC21C015 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D2D21C001 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so1131660bkw.40 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:41:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h2ZKmkBk7RXKMody1/XVK57/YVKe+ZE22buc/9nb1MI=; b=TQTpmfqQ944iipVadSgt0OHi+OWs6bvihs2vyIcYyF32r8YjtG5CuWa61/d0GfnLO5 S0KBVDtQr/EL0gefzUT46ramHbJxiJBMEwjcH4viF4ID2U/sFcd7v4Xgv2FHeDTf5Djf j/OI269f8uMLMmNKkke5Z/qpHJ7eaE9c2lqfgcZ/N4q3el77cuH15jHZ96MZRkdYkapK waYPVZluUgQF8WfljiaTyuKMB8OssBPf/ZICWxED9naui+G1tIvSCSnKAXumMpC0IyPN L4bLH+RusNOXzTLVc6kjkr39NjDNqfbCwPtaXUpFUntkkWZec1yaURHY4D9/zZThJGae punw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.137 with SMTP id g9mr315360bkw.106.1345117296618; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.14.76 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:41:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86628jdyf6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86wr1tcz8f.fsf@gmail.com> <86d333cngt.fsf@gmail.com> <5020DD0A.3030506@gentoo.org> <86ipct6k80.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <50235319.5000504@gentoo.org> <867gt75uab.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5024CB9F.4060906@gentoo.org> <86y5lml15i.fsf_-_@gentoo.org> <86vcgpj8d8.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5028BBBE.6060109@gentoo.org> <861uj8faqh.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <502C1903.1090805@gentoo.org> <86628jdyf6.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:41:36 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IuMIm6B0_BrIzAfA8V6H7bLBoFA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012 From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: a3ad6901-41ab-40ed-baeb-87442ca719dc X-Archives-Hash: 65861f2781745a1a3f6a70bc96901fe0 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:38 AM, wrote: > Luca Barbato writes: >> On 8/15/12 5:14 PM, heroxbd@gmail.com wrote: >>> 2. A evaluation of existing init systems >>> >>> This includes solaris SMF, Mac OSX launchd, Fedora systemd, OpenSUSE >>> systemd/LSB combo, Ubuntu upstart and Debian LSB/insserv combo. >> >> Were is it? I'd like to read it =) > > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems > > And the "counter systemd" talk page, > > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_init_systems Just a comment on this - OpenRC is listed as having parallel startup support, but I believe that this configuration is actually considered unsupported on Gentoo even if the code is there. I believe even the configuration options were removed from the config file to discourage their user (though if somebody happens to know about the option they can add it in and it will work. It is probably worth noting that this is an experimental feature in a comparison. Rich