From: "Otávio Pontes" <otaviobp@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Multiple Repository Support in Portage - Week 3
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:56:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilCOShc5ir_9X4uJzzbgFphAe9pBVvMb7Tr_IJo@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276639916.2991.64.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:11, Brian Dolbec <brian.dolbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 19:42 +0200, Auke Booij wrote:
>> Paludis actually puts the repository name after the package, for
>> example app-portage/eix::gentoo. Is there any specific reason you
>> decided to do it your way? I don't know how pkgcore does this, btw,
>> just interested to hear your reasoning.
There isn't a specific reason i did this way. Actually, i have read
the Paludis docs and copied the '::' from they. But i misunderstood.
I will change it to fit the paludis and pkgcore way.
Thanks for the hint.
Otávio Pontes
>>
>> tulcod.
>
>
> Yes pkgcore is the same repo syntax as paludis. So why mess with a
> standard the other 2 package mangers have had for a few years already?
> It'll be confusing as hell for users trying to figure out and keep
> straight between PM's and forum postings saying one way, then another.
> Also for someone like me coding a gui frontend it means having 2
> different code blocks to do the same thing, one for each syntax style :(
>
>>
>> 2010/6/15 Otávio Pontes <otaviobp@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi,
>> > Last week i was working with adding to portage support for emerging
>> > packages from one specific repository.
>> > Atom class was modified to support a new field, with repository name.
>> > Now before package category it is possible to add a repository name
>> > followed by '::'.
>> > So emerge gentoo::app-portage/eix is the eix from repository gentoo.
>> > Atom class is already working, but emerge is still ignoring this
>> > repository name.
>> > It was also necessary to change other places in portage because slot
>> > separator is ':' and portage was getting confused when atom has '::'.
>> > This week work will be to use this atom information in portdbapi and
>> > in the dependency resolver to use ebuilds from the specified
>> > repository.
>> >
>> > Otávio
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Brian Dolbec <brian.dolbec@gmail.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-15 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-15 15:57 [gentoo-soc] Multiple Repository Support in Portage - Week 3 Otávio Pontes
2010-06-15 17:42 ` Auke Booij
2010-06-15 22:11 ` Brian Dolbec
2010-06-15 22:56 ` Otávio Pontes [this message]
2010-06-16 14:36 ` Otávio Pontes
2010-06-16 15:47 ` Auke Booij
2010-06-16 16:36 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-19 3:48 ` Brian Harring
[not found] ` <20100619120615.24f9c07e@snowcone>
2010-06-19 20:18 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-19 21:37 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2010-06-19 22:43 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-22 13:01 ` Otávio Pontes
2010-06-16 16:58 ` Zac Medico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTilCOShc5ir_9X4uJzzbgFphAe9pBVvMb7Tr_IJo@mail.gmail.com \
--to=otaviobp@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox