From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-soc+bounces-1868-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F2D1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:20:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D695E09FB;
	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:20:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com (mail-pb0-f41.google.com [209.85.160.41])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB265E09FB
	for <gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:20:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rp16so5792902pbb.0
        for <gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent
         :mime-version:content-type;
        bh=w+c9WS6RjrYIS1QfZu+8yDSHMIc86y0Ps63ahxKVaEA=;
        b=gCwgqFB6yiL0BPIpnHZmjysxdY4xSH5KmfLDDlzcoInvvViglyQzVEhGmJbiZVi7ZW
         OrZJZXUHbmhBMqnh/00YmpYNiCsz3NbXn+0aLMbSr9sLud/LRqIT7sPhNnUR4kBGc1uc
         tuiArGCBbG76wtHfqztY+emP5lxLb1Cxsnhn5ruuEFfKh3NGrkjeBczbiafOTDmdZ0+V
         QRCoUs9O8ANacxA9FExeFnhbX7T2mqfTqTn9+KjdOyKNGitGgxz067BCoGiOnnDYcX0p
         FVGZ8pez/BqH6K7/wCdvSSyBN74uGwun/3z2gZx951xJ8Gol/nkrOtVcgkts5EP3Rogg
         usbw==
X-Received: by 10.66.254.70 with SMTP id ag6mr9795338pad.101.1371702053701;
        Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proton.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp (softbank126045221073.bbtec.net. [126.45.221.73])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yj2sm25925477pbb.40.2013.06.19.21.20.52
        for <gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: heroxbd <heroxbd@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Gentoo on Android: Summary for  2013.6.7-19
References: <87bo72p3gv.fsf@proton.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp>
	<51C1DA23.5050907@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:20:25 +0900
In-Reply-To: <51C1DA23.5050907@gentoo.org> (Luca Barbato's message of "Wed, 19
	Jun 2013 18:19:47 +0200")
Message-ID: <8761x9o1km.fsf@proton.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-soc+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-soc+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-soc+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-soc.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Archives-Salt: 9083e42a-8770-4e4e-9bde-c1a8f89384a5
X-Archives-Hash: ebcb03773f347eb10f5c9a8d8dc9bf64

Dear Luca,

Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> writes:

> The plan is fine, but if there is time left I'd like to focus on using
> clang as main compiler for prefix and use musl as prefix libc.
>
> The rationale for the first is to push a bit the boundary the second is
> because musl had been touted as a good match as side-libc for android
> since it is really compact yet posix functional.

Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I have digged through
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Clang and http://www.musl-libc.org. As I am
personally after a Gentoo/XWayland mobile device, I'd like to give
Prefix/libc on arm a higher priority than alternative cc/libc.

Cheers,
Benda