From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F2D1381F3 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D695E09FB; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com (mail-pb0-f41.google.com [209.85.160.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB265E09FB for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rp16so5792902pbb.0 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=w+c9WS6RjrYIS1QfZu+8yDSHMIc86y0Ps63ahxKVaEA=; b=gCwgqFB6yiL0BPIpnHZmjysxdY4xSH5KmfLDDlzcoInvvViglyQzVEhGmJbiZVi7ZW OrZJZXUHbmhBMqnh/00YmpYNiCsz3NbXn+0aLMbSr9sLud/LRqIT7sPhNnUR4kBGc1uc tuiArGCBbG76wtHfqztY+emP5lxLb1Cxsnhn5ruuEFfKh3NGrkjeBczbiafOTDmdZ0+V QRCoUs9O8ANacxA9FExeFnhbX7T2mqfTqTn9+KjdOyKNGitGgxz067BCoGiOnnDYcX0p FVGZ8pez/BqH6K7/wCdvSSyBN74uGwun/3z2gZx951xJ8Gol/nkrOtVcgkts5EP3Rogg usbw== X-Received: by 10.66.254.70 with SMTP id ag6mr9795338pad.101.1371702053701; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proton.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp (softbank126045221073.bbtec.net. [126.45.221.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yj2sm25925477pbb.40.2013.06.19.21.20.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:53 -0700 (PDT) From: heroxbd To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Gentoo on Android: Summary for 2013.6.7-19 References: <87bo72p3gv.fsf@proton.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp> <51C1DA23.5050907@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:20:25 +0900 In-Reply-To: <51C1DA23.5050907@gentoo.org> (Luca Barbato's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:19:47 +0200") Message-ID: <8761x9o1km.fsf@proton.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: 9083e42a-8770-4e4e-9bde-c1a8f89384a5 X-Archives-Hash: ebcb03773f347eb10f5c9a8d8dc9bf64 Dear Luca, Luca Barbato writes: > The plan is fine, but if there is time left I'd like to focus on using > clang as main compiler for prefix and use musl as prefix libc. > > The rationale for the first is to push a bit the boundary the second is > because musl had been touted as a good match as side-libc for android > since it is really compact yet posix functional. Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I have digged through http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Clang and http://www.musl-libc.org. As I am personally after a Gentoo/XWayland mobile device, I'd like to give Prefix/libc on arm a higher priority than alternative cc/libc. Cheers, Benda