public inbox for gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-soc] netifrc on systemd: Weekly Report #5
@ 2014-06-22  5:50 Rabi Shanker Guha
  2014-06-22  5:59 ` heroxbd
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rabi Shanker Guha @ 2014-06-22  5:50 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-soc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 998 bytes --]

Hello,

This week I tested the codebase on gentoo+systemd machines.
Upon testing it on a actual systemd machine, I figured out the missing
functions and fixed a few bugs. I could successfully test eth0 and lo
interfaces. I also tested it on a gentoo+openrc system to make sure that I
did not introduce any breaking changes

Added the prototype for is_net_fs function and defined functions primarily
used in the depend block (program, after, need, etc.)

I'm attaching the VirtualBox Image I'm using and the build instructions
here:
VirtualBox image:
Gentoo -
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B8yZctFMulwlT2hwanNpTVdJWkE&usp=sharing

Build Instructions:
1. After getting the VM running, I generally mount /usr/portage and
/usr/local/portage from my local machine
/usr/local/portage is my local overlay:
https://github.com/rabisg/gentoo-overlay
But now netifrc-9999 is installed anyways
2. You can directly run
sudo systemctl restart net@eth0
sudo systemctl status net@eth0

-- 
Regards,
Rabi

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2324 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-soc] netifrc on systemd: Weekly Report #5
  2014-06-22  5:50 [gentoo-soc] netifrc on systemd: Weekly Report #5 Rabi Shanker Guha
@ 2014-06-22  5:59 ` heroxbd
  2014-06-22 14:28   ` Rabi Shanker Guha
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: heroxbd @ 2014-06-22  5:59 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-soc

Hey Rabi,

Rabi Shanker Guha <guha.rabishankar@gmail.com> writes:

> sudo systemctl restart net@eth0 
> sudo systemctl status net@eth0

Just curious how this naming scheme were formed. Intuitively, eth0 is a
subset of net, making "eth0@net" and "net.eth0" more natural.

Benda


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-soc] netifrc on systemd: Weekly Report #5
  2014-06-22  5:59 ` heroxbd
@ 2014-06-22 14:28   ` Rabi Shanker Guha
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rabi Shanker Guha @ 2014-06-22 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-soc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]

Hello Benda,

Actually this is not my convention. This is piggybacking on the systemd
convention
In the current system (openrc) net.eth0 is a symlink to net.lo and the
interface is deduced at run-time and appropriate action is taken.
In systemd instantiated services work in the same way. Symlink to the
original service and the @ part is passed as a parameter and I guess it is
supposed to be used the same way too i.e. the @ part is to be  seen as an
variable. So I thought this would be the best way to represent it in
systemd setting.

Hope this makes sense.


On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:29 AM, <heroxbd@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Rabi,
>
> Rabi Shanker Guha <guha.rabishankar@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > sudo systemctl restart net@eth0
> > sudo systemctl status net@eth0
>
> Just curious how this naming scheme were formed. Intuitively, eth0 is a
> subset of net, making "eth0@net" and "net.eth0" more natural.
>
> Benda
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Rabi

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1525 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-22 14:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-22  5:50 [gentoo-soc] netifrc on systemd: Weekly Report #5 Rabi Shanker Guha
2014-06-22  5:59 ` heroxbd
2014-06-22 14:28   ` Rabi Shanker Guha

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox