From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABE11381F3 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A9CDE09F0; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D9BE09F0 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.95] (dynamic-adsl-84-220-80-211.clienti.tiscali.it [84.220.80.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0C9C33E377 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51B1ECB2.2080804@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:22:42 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130411 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Gentoo on Android: Plan for 2013.6.7-14 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4058a474-e682-44fa-b957-c4b93fa70275 X-Archives-Hash: b50500474a4a0defa47e8709bdc60f87 On 06/07/2013 03:19 PM, Benda Xu wrote: > Dear Guys and Gals, > > Until now, I have been trying to build a Gentoo Prefix with native libc > now and then(coined as prefix-libc). > > In the following week, I will make a hack to binutils-config to inject > dynamic-loader into Gentoo Prefix ELF executable and libraries, so that > they can call dynamic linker within Prefix instead relying on rpath > mechanism. > > I will also test a list of ebuild to watch out for any possible regressions. > > In the mean time, the discussion of portage having complete support of > prefix and cross building will continue. Please keep us updated and tell me if you need anything and there is already something you want it to be tested. lu