From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E15138010 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B17BE052E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B69E055E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Nyx.local (dynamic-adsl-84-221-83-179.clienti.tiscali.it [84.221.83.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E73B1B42F9 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5033AF72.2000101@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:55:30 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120808 Thunderbird/15.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012 References: <86wr1tcz8f.fsf@gmail.com> <86d333cngt.fsf@gmail.com> <5020DD0A.3030506@gentoo.org> <86ipct6k80.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <50235319.5000504@gentoo.org> <867gt75uab.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5024CB9F.4060906@gentoo.org> <86y5lml15i.fsf_-_@gentoo.org> <86vcgpj8d8.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5028BBBE.6060109@gentoo.org> <861uj8faqh.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <502C1903.1090805@gentoo.org> <86628jdyf6.fsf@gmail.com> <86sjbgpcd1.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86sjbgpcd1.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 315da602-968b-429a-9b0f-115606c59fbd X-Archives-Hash: 77a7d695fec9b828faf5182e007e8ee1 On 8/21/12 4:07 PM, heroxbd@gmail.com wrote: > For monitoring against OOM http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Monit So monit could be integrated in openrc easily ? > cron/at is too general to document, there is one at > > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/cron-guide.xml Agreed. > upstart is designed to replace cron > > http://upstart.ubuntu.com/wiki/ReplaceCron > > systemd recommends to replace cron > > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Optimizations > > while OpenRC just work with it. For some fancy new feature to be used on > non-servers, like "run every 5 minutes after start up", fcron can be > used. Not sure exactly what should we add here. >>>> 5. event driven actions >>>> >>>> Same as hotplug feature already in OpenRC, triggered by udev, just >>>> lack of documentation. If used with runlevel stacking (another under >>>> documented feature of OpenRC), it can cover all the use cases I could >>>> imagine. >>>> >>>> That's enough. upstart features a udev-upstart-bridge after all. It >>>> is a cool feature and we can adopt it with a combo of tools and >>>> achieve sane default behavior by packaging with, e.g., our beloved >>>> ebuild. The revolutionary event based init design is more of >>>> propaganding, IMHO. >>> >>> I'd like to see a wiki page or some more on that =) >> >> Got it, underway... > > A stub page is below. Still thinking of how to present it. May be we can > just load it with examples which covers all the cases upstart being > proud of. > > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/OpenRC/Event_Driven Yes, might be a good approach. > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/OpenRC/StackedRunlevel Interesting example lu